Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bryan898" data-source="post: 2725608" data-attributes="member: 9085">Have you tried out playing with the 3.5 changes to spells yet or have you just looked at them?I also didn't like some of the changes at first, both as a DM and player, but have found they balance the game well.For example:&nbsp; We immensely enjoyed the 3.0 haste, not just spellcasters but everyone.&nbsp; Fighters could move their speed then make a full attack, Paladins could lay on hands in the front line and still attack, fighter/mages could slash their enemy to ribbons with a sword then barbecue them with a fireball, clerics could cast healing spells and still get to do something, etc.&nbsp; For awhile we kept haste 3.0 just because we liked it that way.&nbsp; Eventually though we buckled and switched to 3.5 haste, and you know what?&nbsp; The game was still D&amp;D and it was still fun.&nbsp; Try it out, I bet you still like the game just fine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bryan898, post: 2725608, member: 9085"] Have you tried out playing with the 3.5 changes to spells yet or have you just looked at them? I also didn't like some of the changes at first, both as a DM and player, but have found they balance the game well. For example: We immensely enjoyed the 3.0 haste, not just spellcasters but everyone. Fighters could move their speed then make a full attack, Paladins could lay on hands in the front line and still attack, fighter/mages could slash their enemy to ribbons with a sword then barbecue them with a fireball, clerics could cast healing spells and still get to do something, etc. For awhile we kept haste 3.0 just because we liked it that way. Eventually though we buckled and switched to 3.5 haste, and you know what? The game was still D&D and it was still fun. Try it out, I bet you still like the game just fine. [/QUOTE]

Verification