Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] Uncanny Dodge = Immune to Feints?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Camarath" data-source="post: 1053460" data-attributes="member: 11987"><p>Yes the "extreme or unlikely condition"s are spelled out in the sentence they are listed in the conditional clause after the word if. Also what definition of even are you using? I don't see any definition that fits what you seem to think it means.</p><p></p><p>If I said "you could go to the fair even if I can't come with you" would this mean that under any set of circumstances you will be able to go the the fair? No it does not, it only spells out two circumstances where you can go to the fair the normal defualt situation where I can come with you and the situation where I can not go with you. In both those circumstances you can go to the fair. If the fair burns down does the sentence cover that? No it does not, that is beyond the scope of the sentence, so you may not be able to go to the fair in that case even though the sentence uses "even if". </p><p></p><p>You are wrong about this as well. The function of the conjuntion if is to limit the action of the verb retains. This means that it forces the verb to only apply in the spelled out circumstances. Under the normal rules of english one can not change the meaning of words and the rules of grammer to suit one's own purposes, as you have done here. "If" does not mean "including" it means "in the event that". You will need to find a word in this sentence that serves to make the sentence inclusive. And, as we have seen even does not serve that function and neither does retain because it is modifed by a limiting conjuction. Thus unless you can find a definition for the word if that means "including" or "for example" your assertion is baseless. If you have additional "rules of English" that trump both grammer and the meaning of words please do share them.</p><p></p><p>Here I have replaced if with it's definition. This sentence has the same meaning as the orginal sentence.</p><p>"She retains her Dexterity bonus to AC (if any) even in the event that she is caught flat-footed or struck by an invisible attacker." </p><p></p><p> Jacks feet are sore by default thus he retains his soreness unless some situation relieves of it. The sentance lists two conditions that would normaly relieve his soreness but do not. This does not preculed other non-specified circumstance form relieving his soreness. Then, in the second sentence an example of a situation where his soreness is relieved is given. This second sentence is seaperate form the first sentence and does not limit the possible situations where his soreness might be relieved. It only specifes one instance where the soreness in his feet is relieved. What if Jack takes a large dose of pain killers does the sentence prevent this from relieving Jack soreness? No it does not, it only prevents Jack's "orthotic supports or his fleece insoles" from relieving his soreness. If Jack's bunny slippers were the only way to relieve his soreness the second sentence would need to state that. The second sentence is not exclusive just as the first sentence is not inclusive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Camarath, post: 1053460, member: 11987"] Yes the "extreme or unlikely condition"s are spelled out in the sentence they are listed in the conditional clause after the word if. Also what definition of even are you using? I don't see any definition that fits what you seem to think it means. If I said "you could go to the fair even if I can't come with you" would this mean that under any set of circumstances you will be able to go the the fair? No it does not, it only spells out two circumstances where you can go to the fair the normal defualt situation where I can come with you and the situation where I can not go with you. In both those circumstances you can go to the fair. If the fair burns down does the sentence cover that? No it does not, that is beyond the scope of the sentence, so you may not be able to go to the fair in that case even though the sentence uses "even if". You are wrong about this as well. The function of the conjuntion if is to limit the action of the verb retains. This means that it forces the verb to only apply in the spelled out circumstances. Under the normal rules of english one can not change the meaning of words and the rules of grammer to suit one's own purposes, as you have done here. "If" does not mean "including" it means "in the event that". You will need to find a word in this sentence that serves to make the sentence inclusive. And, as we have seen even does not serve that function and neither does retain because it is modifed by a limiting conjuction. Thus unless you can find a definition for the word if that means "including" or "for example" your assertion is baseless. If you have additional "rules of English" that trump both grammer and the meaning of words please do share them. Here I have replaced if with it's definition. This sentence has the same meaning as the orginal sentence. "She retains her Dexterity bonus to AC (if any) even in the event that she is caught flat-footed or struck by an invisible attacker." Jacks feet are sore by default thus he retains his soreness unless some situation relieves of it. The sentance lists two conditions that would normaly relieve his soreness but do not. This does not preculed other non-specified circumstance form relieving his soreness. Then, in the second sentence an example of a situation where his soreness is relieved is given. This second sentence is seaperate form the first sentence and does not limit the possible situations where his soreness might be relieved. It only specifes one instance where the soreness in his feet is relieved. What if Jack takes a large dose of pain killers does the sentence prevent this from relieving Jack soreness? No it does not, it only prevents Jack's "orthotic supports or his fleece insoles" from relieving his soreness. If Jack's bunny slippers were the only way to relieve his soreness the second sentence would need to state that. The second sentence is not exclusive just as the first sentence is not inclusive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[3.5] Uncanny Dodge = Immune to Feints?
Top