Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bendris Noulg" data-source="post: 857492" data-attributes="member: 6398">On top, one is undeniably driven by its battle-centric/non-RP origins (and the nickname "Evercrack" cannot be a good thing), while the other (though extremely good) has minimum support and a fan-base that's barely able to agree on how certan elements not included in the rules are best represented (i.e., non-cohesive fan community).AU, on the other hand, has no less than three companies producing product for it.As someone that's extremely critical of RPGs (I considered doing reviews at another site but decided against it when I gave the Player's Handbook 2-out-of-5), I'm exceedingly hopeful for AU's potential and success.</blockquote>