Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kitcik" data-source="post: 5579159" data-attributes="member: 98256">Let me reiterate that I am not arguing the RAI point or whether the Dispater should stack. I think it is unclear. However, I think taking the words "with only minor revisions" and saying that means that Dispater does not stack is not a RAW argument, it is a RAI argument. You are stating what you believe to be the intention of "with only minor revisions." Show me the RAW where it says "with only minor revisions" means Dispater does not stack.  And don't show me the general rule about Improved Critical not stacking because that rule is already broken by the subsequent specific rule about Psychic Weapon Master.  This subsequent specific ruling can be taken as an indicator of what was meant by "with only minor revisions" --> indicating that the general rule about improved critical not stacking does not override specific class rulings to the contrary. Again, I am not arguing the RAI point. Despite the point I have just made, I feel RAI is unclear. However, I see nothing in RAW (so far) stating that Dispater does not stack. Your interpretation of "with only minor revisions" is simply that - an interpretation. In other words, your vision of RAI. Which may be perfectly valid. But that does not make it RAW.</blockquote>