Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 937296" data-attributes="member: 7211">Monte Cook helped write 3.0, and has contributed a lot via Malhavoc Press, so yes his opinion has weight. However, I believe in all his ventures he appeals to a certain subset of d&d players, see his label on AU that states it is for groups who are already experienced with normal d&d.I can't say whether he was speaking for the game in general or for that subset of gamers, but I'm inclined to believe the latter. Of course, you could make the claim that there shouldn't be any difference, regardless.An interesting (though soon to be reviled) thing I just thought of, as far as wizards taking the "magic" approach to d&d. They released Portals, a "basic" magic set for beginner users. Then they released regular "experienced" expansion sets (in sets of 3) along with a base set for "advanced" users. The corollary is between 3.5e and the inevitable Complete Warrior, Complete Spell-caster*, etc.Technik*- not a real book, yet.</blockquote>