Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="frankthedm" data-source="post: 5423506" data-attributes="member: 1164">The problem here was first the GM allowed BoED when they and the players were not on the same alignment page and secondly allowing in another set of sub rules, Incarnum, while still rusty.if the players want DM cautioning on aligmment affections, They can pay 1000 GP and have their head slot takes up by a Phylactery of faithfulness. The Only answer the Augury should have gives was &quot;woe&quot;, not &quot;Lots of woe&quot; or &quot;Campaign shattering woe&quot;.The problem campaign might have been solved with the inevitable using it's full abilities. It should have kept demanding the Scroll punctuating each request with a Enervation. If they wouldn't give in to &quot;Return the scroll or be extinguished&quot;, then&nbsp; TPK.On the use of the word gay as a negative term; If you have a problem with someone at the table using a pejorative you don't like, say so at the table. Airing the dirty laundry here feels like you are using the words said in the confidence of close associates to detract from their point of view.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="frankthedm, post: 5423506, member: 1164"] The problem here was first the GM allowed BoED when they and the players were not on the same alignment page and secondly allowing in another set of sub rules, Incarnum, while still rusty. if the players want DM cautioning on aligmment affections, They can pay 1000 GP and have their head slot takes up by a Phylactery of faithfulness. The Only answer the Augury should have gives was "woe", not "Lots of woe" or "Campaign shattering woe". The problem campaign might have been solved with the inevitable using it's full abilities. It should have kept demanding the Scroll punctuating each request with a Enervation. If they wouldn't give in to [I]"Return the scroll or be extinguished"[/I], then TPK. On the use of the word gay as a negative term; If you have a problem with someone at the table using a pejorative you don't like, say so at the table. Airing the dirty laundry here feels like you are using the words said in the [I]confidence of close associates[/I] to detract from their point of view. [/QUOTE]

Verification