Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[3.5E] New Revision Spotlight - Mummy and Mummy Lord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seankreynolds" data-source="post: 862380" data-attributes="member: 3029"><p>Let me restate in a different way:</p><p></p><p>1) 3.0 metamagic is a waste; you have to "pay" for it twice (once by taking the feat, once by using a higher-level spell slot), and it's much less effective for 2 spellcasting classes (bard and rogue). The revised metamagic was well-received among the staff at the time (IIRC), and was something that I'd consider taking (in fact, my sorcerer in the game I'm playing now has the revised Extend Spell). But the revised metamagic feats were dropped from the 3.5 rules because there wasn't enough time to playtest them. So something that many (rightly) complain about in the core rules isn't being fixed, even though the revised PH was done first and so they've had from at least Feb of last year to about Feb of this year to playtest it.</p><p></p><p>2) Revisions are being made to the MM monsters and new monsters added. WotC claims the two versions are compatible (with "minor changes") even though some creatures have obviously experience significant revisions (such as the mummy's +2 HD) and there have been significant changes to the skills, feats, and some special abilities (such as DR). WotC admits some of its original CRs were off and needed to be fixed. And apparently these updated monsters have all been playtested and new CRs assigned.</p><p></p><p>So we have the MM 3.5, which has been in development for less time than the PH, and has more revised material than the PH. And apparently there has been enough time to playtest all of those monsters, but not enough time to playtest the revised metamagic system.</p><p></p><p>And I admit, I'm miffed that the revised metamagic isn't going to be in the PH 3.5. I liked it a lot, and I think Andy Collins did a great job creating it and making it work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seankreynolds, post: 862380, member: 3029"] Let me restate in a different way: 1) 3.0 metamagic is a waste; you have to "pay" for it twice (once by taking the feat, once by using a higher-level spell slot), and it's much less effective for 2 spellcasting classes (bard and rogue). The revised metamagic was well-received among the staff at the time (IIRC), and was something that I'd consider taking (in fact, my sorcerer in the game I'm playing now has the revised Extend Spell). But the revised metamagic feats were dropped from the 3.5 rules because there wasn't enough time to playtest them. So something that many (rightly) complain about in the core rules isn't being fixed, even though the revised PH was done first and so they've had from at least Feb of last year to about Feb of this year to playtest it. 2) Revisions are being made to the MM monsters and new monsters added. WotC claims the two versions are compatible (with "minor changes") even though some creatures have obviously experience significant revisions (such as the mummy's +2 HD) and there have been significant changes to the skills, feats, and some special abilities (such as DR). WotC admits some of its original CRs were off and needed to be fixed. And apparently these updated monsters have all been playtested and new CRs assigned. So we have the MM 3.5, which has been in development for less time than the PH, and has more revised material than the PH. And apparently there has been enough time to playtest all of those monsters, but not enough time to playtest the revised metamagic system. And I admit, I'm miffed that the revised metamagic isn't going to be in the PH 3.5. I liked it a lot, and I think Andy Collins did a great job creating it and making it work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[3.5E] New Revision Spotlight - Mummy and Mummy Lord
Top