Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5e One Year Later
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 1584344" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>3.5 improved the rules which seem to go smoother in more cases and have less problems.</p><p></p><p>However, it had a bad effect on our games. Most of the players bought 3.0 books and didn't want to spend more money on 3.5 books, but are still using the old books to look up for rules. This makes a lot of confusion and lead players to make tactical mistakes.</p><p></p><p>The best thing to do is either stick to 3.0 or move to 3.5 completely, but that wasn't eventually possible in our case. We are actually playing different campaigns with the two ruleset, to please everyone.</p><p></p><p>Another bad effect was to partially invalidate some published material. I would have preferred 3.5 to invalidate everything, but this is just my own preference, that I hate having a book which is only partially valid such as FRCS or DotF, and I have to buy a new equivalent book (PGtF or CD) which updates only part of the old book... then I am left with the doubt of what I have to do with the material that was not updated, and with 2 books to use in place of one.*</p><p></p><p>Since the 3.5 material is anyway better on the overall, if there is something to blame WotC about 3.5 is that it should have been the first version of 3rd edition since the start, or at least it should have come out much earlier, before releasing so many accessory books. Some of the 3.5 bits were so clearly troublesome that it is hard to believe that good playtesting would have missed them.</p><p></p><p>* (edit) I think this is especially bad for FR players.</p><p>If you play 3.0, more or less you have to live with the books published before the revision, otherwise you will buy books with are not fully compatible, and you'll have to "retro-adapt" with 3.0.</p><p>If you play 3.5, you STILL have to buy a FRCS, a Magic of Faerun, a Monster of Faerun, and/or old regional books, for some important information, only that you already know that only part of those book will be usable - except that you have to pay all of it.</p><p></p><p>From a customer perspective, it's a very bad result.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 1584344, member: 1465"] 3.5 improved the rules which seem to go smoother in more cases and have less problems. However, it had a bad effect on our games. Most of the players bought 3.0 books and didn't want to spend more money on 3.5 books, but are still using the old books to look up for rules. This makes a lot of confusion and lead players to make tactical mistakes. The best thing to do is either stick to 3.0 or move to 3.5 completely, but that wasn't eventually possible in our case. We are actually playing different campaigns with the two ruleset, to please everyone. Another bad effect was to partially invalidate some published material. I would have preferred 3.5 to invalidate everything, but this is just my own preference, that I hate having a book which is only partially valid such as FRCS or DotF, and I have to buy a new equivalent book (PGtF or CD) which updates only part of the old book... then I am left with the doubt of what I have to do with the material that was not updated, and with 2 books to use in place of one.* Since the 3.5 material is anyway better on the overall, if there is something to blame WotC about 3.5 is that it should have been the first version of 3rd edition since the start, or at least it should have come out much earlier, before releasing so many accessory books. Some of the 3.5 bits were so clearly troublesome that it is hard to believe that good playtesting would have missed them. * (edit) I think this is especially bad for FR players. If you play 3.0, more or less you have to live with the books published before the revision, otherwise you will buy books with are not fully compatible, and you'll have to "retro-adapt" with 3.0. If you play 3.5, you STILL have to buy a FRCS, a Magic of Faerun, a Monster of Faerun, and/or old regional books, for some important information, only that you already know that only part of those book will be usable - except that you have to pay all of it. From a customer perspective, it's a very bad result. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3.5e One Year Later
Top