Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 4000859" data-attributes="member: 7701">I don't think this is unreasonable. In fact, it makes sense.I suspect most of EN Publishing's customers are also those most interested in 4e, which puts them in a tough place (since Paizo is doing more than swimmingly, according to recent posts by Mona et al).OTOH, my group is sticking with 3.5, and we haven't gone anywhere near EN Publishing's stuff (PDFs suck), and while huge adventure path fans, wouldn't touch War of the Burning Sky with a ten-foot pole. But Paizo (and little less so Goodman) are now getting a fair chunk of change from me - more than in the past, even.It seems Baur's model is reasonably successful, and it actually looks very interesting even to me - someone who thinks $25 for a PDF near-ludicrous, has absolutely zero interest in contributing to the design process (just let me buy the adventure, dammit!), and is confused on the whole &quot;patron&quot; thing and how it relates to getting the older products. And yeah - I'm still intrigued! I do think, though, that being a 'big name' is extremely important with this sort of model (and may also near-guarantee success in the process).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arnwyn, post: 4000859, member: 7701"] I don't think this is unreasonable. In fact, it makes sense. I suspect most of EN Publishing's customers are also those most interested in 4e, which puts them in a tough place (since Paizo is doing more than swimmingly, according to recent posts by Mona et al). OTOH, my group is sticking with 3.5, and we haven't gone anywhere near EN Publishing's stuff (PDFs suck), and while [i]huge[/i] adventure path fans, wouldn't touch War of the Burning Sky with a ten-foot pole. But Paizo (and little less so Goodman) are now getting a fair chunk of change from me - more than in the past, even. It seems Baur's model is reasonably successful, and it actually looks very interesting even to me - someone who thinks $25 for a PDF near-ludicrous, has absolutely [i]zero[/i] interest in contributing to the design process (just let me buy the adventure, dammit!), and is confused on the whole "patron" thing and how it relates to getting the older products. And yeah - I'm still intrigued! I do think, though, that being a 'big name' is extremely important with this sort of model (and may also near-guarantee success in the process). [/QUOTE]

Verification