Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[3.P] Int, Wis or Cha for bonus Action Points?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N'raac" data-source="post: 6067074" data-attributes="member: 6681948"><p>If you pick just one of the three stats, which will always provide bonus AP's, that stat becomes much more useful to all classes.</p><p></p><p>You therefore hand a significant advantage over to classes which already benefit from having a high stat in that attribute. Since you are focused on mental stats, casters will automatically have an advantage. If you select INT, then Wizards, Witches and Alchemists benefit. If you select WIS, this will be great for Clerics. CHA favours Oracles, Sorcerers and Paladins. Classes that don't benefit from the stat you choose will be disadvantages, either forced to devote stat resources to that characteristic, or stuck with less AP's since they don't put much in that stat.</p><p></p><p>So I would modify Billd91's suggestion to either "the lowest of the three mental stats for that specific character" or having all three feed into AP bonuses, given you are determined AP's must be determined by mental stats. Basing the bonus on the lowest of the three, or the average of the three, will avoid giving a huge advantage to classes which already benefit significantly from whichever one of the three you choose.</p><p></p><p>It's important to recognize that you are adding an incentive to whichever stat you choose. If, for example, INT becomes determinative of AP, expect that Sorcerers will be pretty rare - Wizards and Witches will make much better arcane casters, and Maguses probably become a more common "warrior" choice. Elves and Tieflings become good race choices, especially for rogues who value that DEX bonus anyway.</p><p></p><p>If you choose WIS, don't expect to see many Oracles - Clerics will have a significant advantage. Gunslingers become an excellent Martial choice, as they benefit from high WIS. Probably Rangers as well. Dwarves become a solid race choice, since they get bonus WIS and CON, two stats every character now needs. That will further demotivate CHA-based casters, since that's the Dwarven penalty.</p><p></p><p>Pick CHA and you'll see a lot more Oracles and Sorcerers, with Paladins becoming an excellent Martial choice. Dwarves become much less frequent, but expect more Gnomes and Halflings, especially as casters who don't need much in the way of STR.</p><p></p><p>I think you're approaching this the wrong way. It seems like you've already decided you want to pick one of INT, WIS or CHA (ie you aren't open to having all three be relevant, or using a "lower of" or "middle of" the three approach. That means whatever choice you make will favour some classes, races and builds, and provide a disincentive to others. With that in mind, I suggest the question is which stat you want to push the players toward, and which one(s) you want to push them away from. For example, if you want to see more interaction-focused characters, more small characters, less Dwarves and less wizards, witches and clerics, choose CHA. Assess which character builds are advantaged by, or disadvantaged by, each stat, and select the one that provides advantages to the kinds of characters you want to be more prevalent in your game, and the greatest drawbacks to the characters you'd like to see less of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N'raac, post: 6067074, member: 6681948"] If you pick just one of the three stats, which will always provide bonus AP's, that stat becomes much more useful to all classes. You therefore hand a significant advantage over to classes which already benefit from having a high stat in that attribute. Since you are focused on mental stats, casters will automatically have an advantage. If you select INT, then Wizards, Witches and Alchemists benefit. If you select WIS, this will be great for Clerics. CHA favours Oracles, Sorcerers and Paladins. Classes that don't benefit from the stat you choose will be disadvantages, either forced to devote stat resources to that characteristic, or stuck with less AP's since they don't put much in that stat. So I would modify Billd91's suggestion to either "the lowest of the three mental stats for that specific character" or having all three feed into AP bonuses, given you are determined AP's must be determined by mental stats. Basing the bonus on the lowest of the three, or the average of the three, will avoid giving a huge advantage to classes which already benefit significantly from whichever one of the three you choose. It's important to recognize that you are adding an incentive to whichever stat you choose. If, for example, INT becomes determinative of AP, expect that Sorcerers will be pretty rare - Wizards and Witches will make much better arcane casters, and Maguses probably become a more common "warrior" choice. Elves and Tieflings become good race choices, especially for rogues who value that DEX bonus anyway. If you choose WIS, don't expect to see many Oracles - Clerics will have a significant advantage. Gunslingers become an excellent Martial choice, as they benefit from high WIS. Probably Rangers as well. Dwarves become a solid race choice, since they get bonus WIS and CON, two stats every character now needs. That will further demotivate CHA-based casters, since that's the Dwarven penalty. Pick CHA and you'll see a lot more Oracles and Sorcerers, with Paladins becoming an excellent Martial choice. Dwarves become much less frequent, but expect more Gnomes and Halflings, especially as casters who don't need much in the way of STR. I think you're approaching this the wrong way. It seems like you've already decided you want to pick one of INT, WIS or CHA (ie you aren't open to having all three be relevant, or using a "lower of" or "middle of" the three approach. That means whatever choice you make will favour some classes, races and builds, and provide a disincentive to others. With that in mind, I suggest the question is which stat you want to push the players toward, and which one(s) you want to push them away from. For example, if you want to see more interaction-focused characters, more small characters, less Dwarves and less wizards, witches and clerics, choose CHA. Assess which character builds are advantaged by, or disadvantaged by, each stat, and select the one that provides advantages to the kinds of characters you want to be more prevalent in your game, and the greatest drawbacks to the characters you'd like to see less of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[3.P] Int, Wis or Cha for bonus Action Points?
Top