Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3 reasons why the design team shouldn't visit ENWorld
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5424957" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Except you gave no evidence to show why some of the things you mentioned were actually true, or in fact necessarily a bad thing.</p><p></p><p>Taking Dragon and Dungeon in-house had a specific and worthwhile reason... making sure product produced for it had been designed and vetted by the R&D department. </p><p></p><p>You can't use the Character Builder without a subscription to DDI. So what? Why should you be able to?</p><p></p><p>Did the firings at WotC have any appreciable effect that those of us outside the company can actually point to it and say "if this person was still here, this bad result X wouldn't have happened"? Or is it just people who like certain designers don't get to experience a "Dungeons & Dragons" product from them anymore?</p><p></p><p>The "controversial" production of 4E sold many more books than the last gasps of 3.5 books they had produced. So moving to 4E was necessary for WotC from a cashflow point of view because there was nothing left for them to produce on the scale they needed as a very large game company. While a small company like Paizo can live on the smaller scale of product moved by remaining focused on 3.5... WotC could not. Dunno why that's so hard for people to accept, but it's true. *EDIT* I should actually say I <em>believe</em> it's probably true, since I have no actual evidence that compares sales of late 3.5 books vs early 4E books and it's more common-sense speculation on my part.</p><p></p><p>I could go on... but the point is that your list of things were just items that <em>you yourself did not like</em>. They aren't empirical fact, nor even backed up with evidence to support why what YOU don't like is in fact actually bad. So as far as WotC is concerned... it IS just white noise of one person's personal disfavor. And when you have a forum full of threads of people just spewing lists of things they don't like about the game or the company without any indication about what is actually wrong or bad... it's much less draining on your sanity to just ignore it if you are a small company, or hire community supports to do it for you if you're a big one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5424957, member: 7006"] Except you gave no evidence to show why some of the things you mentioned were actually true, or in fact necessarily a bad thing. Taking Dragon and Dungeon in-house had a specific and worthwhile reason... making sure product produced for it had been designed and vetted by the R&D department. You can't use the Character Builder without a subscription to DDI. So what? Why should you be able to? Did the firings at WotC have any appreciable effect that those of us outside the company can actually point to it and say "if this person was still here, this bad result X wouldn't have happened"? Or is it just people who like certain designers don't get to experience a "Dungeons & Dragons" product from them anymore? The "controversial" production of 4E sold many more books than the last gasps of 3.5 books they had produced. So moving to 4E was necessary for WotC from a cashflow point of view because there was nothing left for them to produce on the scale they needed as a very large game company. While a small company like Paizo can live on the smaller scale of product moved by remaining focused on 3.5... WotC could not. Dunno why that's so hard for people to accept, but it's true. *EDIT* I should actually say I [I]believe[/I] it's probably true, since I have no actual evidence that compares sales of late 3.5 books vs early 4E books and it's more common-sense speculation on my part. I could go on... but the point is that your list of things were just items that [I]you yourself did not like[/I]. They aren't empirical fact, nor even backed up with evidence to support why what YOU don't like is in fact actually bad. So as far as WotC is concerned... it IS just white noise of one person's personal disfavor. And when you have a forum full of threads of people just spewing lists of things they don't like about the game or the company without any indication about what is actually wrong or bad... it's much less draining on your sanity to just ignore it if you are a small company, or hire community supports to do it for you if you're a big one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3 reasons why the design team shouldn't visit ENWorld
Top