Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3 Very Different Campaigns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 3242670" data-attributes="member: 23094"><p>Sorry - I should have been more specific. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>1. They're ridiculously complicated. They require either: 1) that the DM trusts his players when they say they've used Character Creation Method X, or 2) that the DM personally vets each new character to ensure compliance. If the DM actually trusts his players, then why doesn't he trust them enough to create balanced characters using all available splat-books?</p><p></p><p>2. They do not favor all classes equally. As mentioned in another thread on a similar topic, it was pointed out that a "properly chosen" Core + 1 cleric is going to be lightyears ahead of, say, a "properly chosen" Core + 3 fighter. Combine that with the fighter having fewer "character build points" (sacrificed to open up those +3 books), and there's an even greater disparity in power.</p><p></p><p>3. They are not balanced across all "archetypes." Take, for instance, someone who wants to run a straight brute barbarian. He really doesn't need much more than what is present in the PHB and, maybe, one extra book for fun. Contrast this, however, with someone who wants to run a light fighter: good, solid, balanced feats for this style have appeared in three separate books. Either he closes himself off to one or more of these options and tries to make a sub-supported archetype work, or he suffers the reduction in build points.</p><p></p><p>4. They make no correction for scale. A cleric who chooses, for instance, the Spell Compendium as his +1 source (and gains access to potentially hundreds of spells) pays the same price as someone who wants exactly 1 feat from a non-PHB book and otherwise is a pure Core character.</p><p></p><p>Does that help to explain my position?</p><p></p><p>EDIT: And Campaign 4 wasn't posted yet when I started on my response to the first three; you can assume that my comments don't apply to that campaign. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 3242670, member: 23094"] Sorry - I should have been more specific. :) 1. They're ridiculously complicated. They require either: 1) that the DM trusts his players when they say they've used Character Creation Method X, or 2) that the DM personally vets each new character to ensure compliance. If the DM actually trusts his players, then why doesn't he trust them enough to create balanced characters using all available splat-books? 2. They do not favor all classes equally. As mentioned in another thread on a similar topic, it was pointed out that a "properly chosen" Core + 1 cleric is going to be lightyears ahead of, say, a "properly chosen" Core + 3 fighter. Combine that with the fighter having fewer "character build points" (sacrificed to open up those +3 books), and there's an even greater disparity in power. 3. They are not balanced across all "archetypes." Take, for instance, someone who wants to run a straight brute barbarian. He really doesn't need much more than what is present in the PHB and, maybe, one extra book for fun. Contrast this, however, with someone who wants to run a light fighter: good, solid, balanced feats for this style have appeared in three separate books. Either he closes himself off to one or more of these options and tries to make a sub-supported archetype work, or he suffers the reduction in build points. 4. They make no correction for scale. A cleric who chooses, for instance, the Spell Compendium as his +1 source (and gains access to potentially hundreds of spells) pays the same price as someone who wants exactly 1 feat from a non-PHB book and otherwise is a pure Core character. Does that help to explain my position? EDIT: And Campaign 4 wasn't posted yet when I started on my response to the first three; you can assume that my comments don't apply to that campaign. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
3 Very Different Campaigns
Top