Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
3 weeks till new Who!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JustinAlexander" data-source="post: 6122557" data-attributes="member: 6700092"><p>It's really, really simple. When you have a conversation like this:</p><p></p><p>"Why can't we do X to solve the problem?"</p><p>"We can't do X because Y will happen."</p><p></p><p>You can't just turn around five minutes later, do X, and have the only justification be "Clara insulted the TARDIS". It's a textbook example of bad writing. Doing it again five minutes later only makes it worse. </p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, throughout both these sequences, you have the psychic doing <em>something</em>. What, exactly? Nothing of relevance, apparently. Which might be acceptable the first time, but then the Doctor has her do it again despite it having no apparent impact on anything. More bad writing. (Even if we ignore the fact that the TARDIS was there for longer than 10 seconds.)</p><p></p><p>Okay, let's assume that Clara just didn't know that the psychic was going to pull it together so the second rescue effort was superfluous. But since we already know that the psychic actually <em>can</em> pull people out of the pocket dimension, why put the TARDIS at risk a second time? It doesn't make any sense within the rules of the universe as they've established them in the episode.</p><p></p><p>The entire ending is a mess.</p><p></p><p>The sad thing is that it wouldn't be particularly difficult to fix it. For example, instead of having the rationale for the TARDIS not being able to help be "in four seconds I'd be stranded, in ten seconds I'd be dead" just cut the second part of that sentence: The TARDIS says, "In four seconds I'd be stranded." And then have Clara says, "But not if you followed a psychic beacon." And, ta-da, you'd have an ending that worked.</p><p></p><p>Or the TARDIS is always part of the solution. Or you just skip the whole TARDIS bit. Or any number of other possibilities.</p><p></p><p>Here's one which would have been thematically interesting: The psychic can pull her descendant out because of their connection; they're family. But once she leaves, the connection snaps shut because the connection doesn't exist any more. Oh crap. How do we get the Doctor out? Well, we need someone with a deep connection to him. Oh, hey. The TARDIS! (And then the same logic applies when you use the monster in the house to retrieve the other monster.)</p><p></p><p>I'm honestly amazed at the number of people trying to defend a blatant deus ex technobabble here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JustinAlexander, post: 6122557, member: 6700092"] It's really, really simple. When you have a conversation like this: "Why can't we do X to solve the problem?" "We can't do X because Y will happen." You can't just turn around five minutes later, do X, and have the only justification be "Clara insulted the TARDIS". It's a textbook example of bad writing. Doing it again five minutes later only makes it worse. Meanwhile, throughout both these sequences, you have the psychic doing [I]something[/I]. What, exactly? Nothing of relevance, apparently. Which might be acceptable the first time, but then the Doctor has her do it again despite it having no apparent impact on anything. More bad writing. (Even if we ignore the fact that the TARDIS was there for longer than 10 seconds.) Okay, let's assume that Clara just didn't know that the psychic was going to pull it together so the second rescue effort was superfluous. But since we already know that the psychic actually [I]can[/I] pull people out of the pocket dimension, why put the TARDIS at risk a second time? It doesn't make any sense within the rules of the universe as they've established them in the episode. The entire ending is a mess. The sad thing is that it wouldn't be particularly difficult to fix it. For example, instead of having the rationale for the TARDIS not being able to help be "in four seconds I'd be stranded, in ten seconds I'd be dead" just cut the second part of that sentence: The TARDIS says, "In four seconds I'd be stranded." And then have Clara says, "But not if you followed a psychic beacon." And, ta-da, you'd have an ending that worked. Or the TARDIS is always part of the solution. Or you just skip the whole TARDIS bit. Or any number of other possibilities. Here's one which would have been thematically interesting: The psychic can pull her descendant out because of their connection; they're family. But once she leaves, the connection snaps shut because the connection doesn't exist any more. Oh crap. How do we get the Doctor out? Well, we need someone with a deep connection to him. Oh, hey. The TARDIS! (And then the same logic applies when you use the monster in the house to retrieve the other monster.) I'm honestly amazed at the number of people trying to defend a blatant deus ex technobabble here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
3 weeks till new Who!
Top