Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="koga305" data-source="post: 6257776" data-attributes="member: 6747640">Although the poll options seem a bit slanted, I voted &quot;it doesn't matter much either way.&quot; I mostly run Theater of the Mind, so movement speeds aren't really an issue, but if I did run a battle grid, I doubt many people would notice in everyday gameplay, and it does simplify things a bit (every character moves at the same rate = one fewer thing to remember). That said, I can see the lack of verisimilitude being an issue for some. Whatever satisfies the highest number of other people is fine by me.I don't agree with every aspect of Next, however. For example, I think the lack of a Fighter-based warlord type is a mistake, and the new Dragonborn backstory is pretty bad compared to both 4E's and 3E's story. It seems a little silly to assume that going with whatever the devs decide on the speed issue means I approve of every choice they've made and ever will make.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="koga305, post: 6257776, member: 6747640"] Although the poll options seem a bit slanted, I voted "it doesn't matter much either way." I mostly run Theater of the Mind, so movement speeds aren't really an issue, but if I did run a battle grid, I doubt many people would notice in everyday gameplay, and it does simplify things a bit (every character moves at the same rate = one fewer thing to remember). That said, I can see the lack of verisimilitude being an issue for some. Whatever satisfies the highest number of other people is fine by me. I don't agree with every aspect of Next, however. For example, I think the lack of a Fighter-based warlord type is a mistake, and the new Dragonborn backstory is pretty bad compared to both 4E's and 3E's story. It seems a little silly to assume that going with whatever the devs decide on the speed issue means I approve of every choice they've made and ever will make. [/QUOTE]

Verification