Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
3D battlemats with DI?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 3727807" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>Slopes should be easy to handle. Just give each square an elevation statistic. You wouldn't even have to draw the elevation if you didn't want. If the elevation difference is too high the slope is impassible. I'm sure DI can handle the technology Battletech has been using since the 70s.</p><p></p><p>Having one level over top of each other is a lot tougher. If you're just creating contour on a flat map, your rules of connectivity don't change. If a square is next to another one, you can travel between them. But if you've got levels, you have to define connectivity between squares instead of just having the default "everything touches what it touches" as the rule.</p><p></p><p>If you do define connectivity, though, the sky is the limit in terms of complex maps. You could do rigging, you could do anything. For rigging, you'd just draw some rigging and define points on it where a character can be.</p><p></p><p>As for flying, that's a different issue. That should be pretty easy. Give characters in a flying state an elevation, and animate them up in the air. The rules already cover 3d area of effects- or I should say, they cover them as well as they cover firing diagonal on a grid. The only additional programming you might not think of is the need to program in a ceiling.</p><p></p><p>And of course there's the one giant shortcut people are forgetting- Let the DM draw any map he wants, and let the players do whatever the heck they want with their miniature. Then the DM can tell them whether they can or can't do the thing they tried.</p><p></p><p>This is probably the best solution. Programming in game rules is silly because it will create havoc with house rules, special events, etc, etc. Just let players place their pieces anywhere they want on the map, and move them however they like, and the DM can handle the rest.</p><p></p><p>That's how a normal game map works. No law of physics stops my miniature from climbing up a sheer wall in plate armor without making a climb check. Just the DM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 3727807, member: 40961"] Slopes should be easy to handle. Just give each square an elevation statistic. You wouldn't even have to draw the elevation if you didn't want. If the elevation difference is too high the slope is impassible. I'm sure DI can handle the technology Battletech has been using since the 70s. Having one level over top of each other is a lot tougher. If you're just creating contour on a flat map, your rules of connectivity don't change. If a square is next to another one, you can travel between them. But if you've got levels, you have to define connectivity between squares instead of just having the default "everything touches what it touches" as the rule. If you do define connectivity, though, the sky is the limit in terms of complex maps. You could do rigging, you could do anything. For rigging, you'd just draw some rigging and define points on it where a character can be. As for flying, that's a different issue. That should be pretty easy. Give characters in a flying state an elevation, and animate them up in the air. The rules already cover 3d area of effects- or I should say, they cover them as well as they cover firing diagonal on a grid. The only additional programming you might not think of is the need to program in a ceiling. And of course there's the one giant shortcut people are forgetting- Let the DM draw any map he wants, and let the players do whatever the heck they want with their miniature. Then the DM can tell them whether they can or can't do the thing they tried. This is probably the best solution. Programming in game rules is silly because it will create havoc with house rules, special events, etc, etc. Just let players place their pieces anywhere they want on the map, and move them however they like, and the DM can handle the rest. That's how a normal game map works. No law of physics stops my miniature from climbing up a sheer wall in plate armor without making a climb check. Just the DM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
3D battlemats with DI?
Top