Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
3d20 variant for 3d6/2d10 to replace d20. Thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7850424" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>Sure, glad to.</p><p></p><p>Think of the result of a typical person's effort at something, even when trying their best. Most often, their "best" will be typical of their skill. Rarely, the perform beyond their norm. Sometimes, they falter, but that is not common either.</p><p></p><p>With a flat d20, you are just as likely to roll a 1 as a 20 as a 10. In other words, you are just as likely to get worst effort, normal effort, or best effort.</p><p></p><p>Now, I see why due to combat being a series of rolls (typically not just a swing or two), the linear nature of the d20 sort of works to become non-linear. It <em>still</em> bugs me a little, but not so much as to worry about it right now.</p><p></p><p>For contested skill checks, for example, a person with a high bonus, say +11 (maximum normal sans expertise), will still lose to someone with a no modifier (+0) 9% of the time and 2.25% they will tie. I've never liked that as it seems pretty bad that someone with high skill and ability would not win over 10% of the time. I had another thread on this a while back.</p><p></p><p>Now, if I change to using 2d10, it drops to only 3.3% will no modifier win or tie against +11. 3d6 is actually even more extreme, lowering it the chance to only 0.45%! These actually works more towards my concept than 3d20 take middle, actually. My biggest like of 3d20 was there would be no extra math (yeah, not a huge deal but one player in particular has issues even with simple math).</p><p></p><p>So, ultimately I want skill to matter more than luck and with a flat d20, there is too much luck in rolling a high or low roll, resulting in a great performance or poor one. Results should be more typical. By switching to 2d10, for instance, the high and low rolls are less common, meaning performance beyond normal or well below are less likely. Thus, a higher bonus makes a greater difference towards getting higher results than just a lucky die roll.</p><p></p><p>Hopefully, that makes sense. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7850424, member: 6987520"] Sure, glad to. Think of the result of a typical person's effort at something, even when trying their best. Most often, their "best" will be typical of their skill. Rarely, the perform beyond their norm. Sometimes, they falter, but that is not common either. With a flat d20, you are just as likely to roll a 1 as a 20 as a 10. In other words, you are just as likely to get worst effort, normal effort, or best effort. Now, I see why due to combat being a series of rolls (typically not just a swing or two), the linear nature of the d20 sort of works to become non-linear. It [I]still[/I] bugs me a little, but not so much as to worry about it right now. For contested skill checks, for example, a person with a high bonus, say +11 (maximum normal sans expertise), will still lose to someone with a no modifier (+0) 9% of the time and 2.25% they will tie. I've never liked that as it seems pretty bad that someone with high skill and ability would not win over 10% of the time. I had another thread on this a while back. Now, if I change to using 2d10, it drops to only 3.3% will no modifier win or tie against +11. 3d6 is actually even more extreme, lowering it the chance to only 0.45%! These actually works more towards my concept than 3d20 take middle, actually. My biggest like of 3d20 was there would be no extra math (yeah, not a huge deal but one player in particular has issues even with simple math). So, ultimately I want skill to matter more than luck and with a flat d20, there is too much luck in rolling a high or low roll, resulting in a great performance or poor one. Results should be more typical. By switching to 2d10, for instance, the high and low rolls are less common, meaning performance beyond normal or well below are less likely. Thus, a higher bonus makes a greater difference towards getting higher results than just a lucky die roll. Hopefully, that makes sense. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
3d20 variant for 3d6/2d10 to replace d20. Thoughts?
Top