Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="N0Man" data-source="post: 5026397" data-attributes="member: 64066">I don't really see that as being an appropriate analogy.However, I think it would be more accurate for your analogy to go along with something like they own the stadium, they let people come in and play and even charge admission to the games, and then suddenly say this is private property and that the only games that want run are their own games that the landowner will be the one getting the admission profits, unless under a new and less favorable deal with little notice of this coming.Yeah, it would suck when you were depending on this being available and maybe you were expecting income off this that you will no longer see.  Sure, it's an awkward spot, and sure it's understandable to be annoyed, but at the same time they'd be completely within their rights to do so and the only reason you're in this spot was because you were benefiting from their generosity in the first place.It sucks to lose that position and freedom you had before, and frustration is understandable, but hatred for not only the owner, but all baseball games run by the landowner and the fans that still are attending games is a bit unreasonable.</blockquote>