Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3E and the Feel of D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Son of the Serpent" data-source="post: 7850484" data-attributes="member: 7015476"><p>Sort of a side note relavant to an earlier post of mine. My circle of role players (includes a couple dms so we all get pc time) probably averages one the line between NG and TN when the campaigns and pcs are aggregated. We have used a fair amount of evil pcs but have used just enough more good ones that its slightly pushed in that direction from TN. That said weve played enough of every alignment that i feel confident that when a group is flush with realistic psychology it comports pretty well to reality. I think both in d&d and the real world, between the polarizing effects of good, chaos, law, and evil, evil is actually the least likely polar persuasion to harm capacity for cooperation. Good is the most likely. With law and chaos its about equal where chaos is likely to cause it in short term fashion and law is more likely to cause it in long term long lasting fashion. Obviously neutrality is a completely different ball game from the rest in at least some ways. But the reason evil seems not to have the tendancies of the rest is that self consciously evil people cannot comvince themselves they are righteous. They inherently are the most advanced at theory of mind as they are thrust into situations where it would both be benefircial and for them less disagreeable to manipulate and take advantage of people to their own ends and comprehending others as they are not hindered from pursuing that. Its not a perfect comparison bit consider the evolution of predators and omnivores. They are generally more intelligent than their prey and more capable of theory of mind because their way of life pressures that they must or starve. So they see others points of view. And are not as easily blinded to the big picture. In this way, evil is the most similar to neutral in its intellectual, social, and emotional capabilities but with a few less limitations, like giving a crap quite as often about the fall out. But just as capably aware of it. Again, this is assuming you only consider an actual evil aligned person to be self awarely evil. Just thought i wanted to add onto my earlier thinking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Son of the Serpent, post: 7850484, member: 7015476"] Sort of a side note relavant to an earlier post of mine. My circle of role players (includes a couple dms so we all get pc time) probably averages one the line between NG and TN when the campaigns and pcs are aggregated. We have used a fair amount of evil pcs but have used just enough more good ones that its slightly pushed in that direction from TN. That said weve played enough of every alignment that i feel confident that when a group is flush with realistic psychology it comports pretty well to reality. I think both in d&d and the real world, between the polarizing effects of good, chaos, law, and evil, evil is actually the least likely polar persuasion to harm capacity for cooperation. Good is the most likely. With law and chaos its about equal where chaos is likely to cause it in short term fashion and law is more likely to cause it in long term long lasting fashion. Obviously neutrality is a completely different ball game from the rest in at least some ways. But the reason evil seems not to have the tendancies of the rest is that self consciously evil people cannot comvince themselves they are righteous. They inherently are the most advanced at theory of mind as they are thrust into situations where it would both be benefircial and for them less disagreeable to manipulate and take advantage of people to their own ends and comprehending others as they are not hindered from pursuing that. Its not a perfect comparison bit consider the evolution of predators and omnivores. They are generally more intelligent than their prey and more capable of theory of mind because their way of life pressures that they must or starve. So they see others points of view. And are not as easily blinded to the big picture. In this way, evil is the most similar to neutral in its intellectual, social, and emotional capabilities but with a few less limitations, like giving a crap quite as often about the fall out. But just as capably aware of it. Again, this is assuming you only consider an actual evil aligned person to be self awarely evil. Just thought i wanted to add onto my earlier thinking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
3E and the Feel of D&D
Top