Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 508070" data-attributes="member: 5724">My take on the iconics.. in order of apperanceKrusk: Chain shirt in bad repair. Axe as large as his chest!?. Devis: good picture, a little to &quot;wonky&quot; for me but he's a bard <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Jozan: excellent.Vadania: Hide armor?&nbsp; Not what she's wearing..Tordek: good but his axe is again friggen huge! war axes are much smaller.Ember: She's gonna bouncy bouncy outta that, a girl like her needs more support.Alhandra: Just what on earth is she wearing!? A new triangle sized piece of scale mail? so far my least favorite.Soveliss: pretty goodLidda: not badHennet: he's definitely making a fashion question instead of a statement.Mialee: she's probably dating hennetNebin: Nice goggles. How much startch for that collar?I have to fall in with the others who've said the art in the book is dated. I don't mind art about a dated subject, but art style that is dated i find a little more irksome.&nbsp; It just that i've seen to many different styles i just dont have the &quot;wow, thats interesting&quot; enjoyment of art i had when younger.&nbsp; Its the reason why i posted this oh so scientific post<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />technically, the 3E art is good, probably better than other editions with exceptions of course. I'm starting to wonder if the medium shift from physical to computer is perhaps more the root of my dissatisfaction... hrm.. that could be another poll... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; Thanks for all the responses!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />joe b.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 508070, member: 5724"] My take on the iconics.. in order of apperance Krusk: Chain shirt in bad repair. Axe as large as his chest!?. Devis: good picture, a little to "wonky" for me but he's a bard :) Jozan: excellent. Vadania: Hide armor? Not what she's wearing.. Tordek: good but his axe is again friggen huge! war axes are much smaller. Ember: She's gonna bouncy bouncy outta that, a girl like her needs more support. Alhandra: Just what on earth is she wearing!? A new triangle sized piece of scale mail? so far my least favorite. Soveliss: pretty good Lidda: not bad Hennet: he's definitely making a fashion question instead of a statement. Mialee: she's probably dating hennet Nebin: Nice goggles. How much startch for that collar? I have to fall in with the others who've said the art in the book is dated. I don't mind art about a dated subject, but art style that is dated i find a little more irksome. It just that i've seen to many different styles i just dont have the "wow, thats interesting" enjoyment of art i had when younger. Its the reason why i posted this oh so scientific post:) technically, the 3E art is good, probably better than other editions with exceptions of course. I'm starting to wonder if the medium shift from physical to computer is perhaps more the root of my dissatisfaction... hrm.. that could be another poll... :) Thanks for all the responses! :) joe b. [/QUOTE]

Verification