Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Geron Raveneye" data-source="post: 128697" data-attributes="member: 2268">I have to agree......I´m not sure a differentiation through school restriction is the best way to express the flair of the three Orders under 3E..although I thought that of 1E and 2E, too  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />  The denominators of spells, like [Evil] and [Good] are a nice way to make a difference, for example. I´d forbid the opposite for the White and Black Robes, and let them be open for the Red Robes. Furthermore, I´d select some spells that definitely belong to either colour. Spells that primarily help others, without regard for own health, I´d place in the White Robes portfolio. Spells that get an advantage for the caster on the back of another person would be Black Robe material (e.g. Vampiric Touch). Spells that act to help the caster judge a situation/person (Detect Thoughts, for example) would be Red Robe magic, additionally some illusions.Of course there shouldn´t be too many spells of each level above the 1st in either portfolio, just enough to clarify the differences. The greater selection for the Red Robes could be equalized by giving them a slightly slower spell progression.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification