Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="applenerd" data-source="post: 725091" data-attributes="member: 1051">At least now the rules seem to be more consistent.  Even if I don't remember a specific rule I can usually puzzle out what it is by asking myself what makes sense and most times I'm not far off.  With second edition I definitely spent a LOT more time looking things up.  Play flows much more smoothly now.I tend to agree with you here a bit.  The expanded amounts of choice allowed to players in 3E can mean more work for a DM trying to decide whether a particular prestige class will fit into the campaign.  Personally however I feel it is very worth the extra effort.  I wouldn't want to go back to class kits.Please refer to pages 47-58 of the dmg.  It's not that bad.True, true.  Can't wait for Dragonlance 3e to come out!Is this really a problem?  I would be interested to hear people's take on this.  Personally I have found that the increased variety has brought some of that ever talked about "spice" to my campaign.  I also have been able to find common ground game-wise with most 3e players that I have met fairly quickly.I would tend to agree. Due to the ogl, there has been a glut of garbage modules released.  However there have also been some great adventures released by both wotc and third parties.  I find the reviews section of this site especially helpful for guiding my purchasing decisions.Not sure what you mean by this one...Point taken however I feel that 2e certainly wasn't any better (it was much worse imho).  I can't speak for 1e since I never played it.  There are certainly problems with 3e as with any system this large.  However I welcome the small problems the new system brings because overall 3e solves many of the glaringly large problems of 2e.  I also have high hopes that 3.5 will help clean up some of the cruft.  I'll never go back.  Ever.</blockquote>

Verification