Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 44748" data-attributes="member: 2486">Doesn't this screw sorcerors and psions?I mean, half the point of sorceror and psions is their ability to cast 'on the fly' without having to memorise spells like their wizardly counterparts, for which they paid for with a limited repertoire.If the mana system is introduced, wizards get the chance to cast ANY spell in their book 'on the fly', making them many times more versatile than the sorceror and the psion.In the past discussions on which is the more powerful, sorcerors' key advantage is this ability.&nbsp; The mana system not only removes this ability, it shifts the emphasis way over to the side of the wizard.The only way this could be balanced would be to increase PP/MP for sorcerors/psions, and to behave expand their spells/powers known.&nbsp; As it stands it effectively destroys one core class and the fundamentals of an entire supplement BOOK.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Al, post: 44748, member: 2486"] Doesn't this screw sorcerors and psions? I mean, half the point of sorceror and psions is their ability to cast 'on the fly' without having to memorise spells like their wizardly counterparts, for which they paid for with a limited repertoire. If the mana system is introduced, wizards get the chance to cast ANY spell in their book 'on the fly', making them many times more versatile than the sorceror and the psion. In the past discussions on which is the more powerful, sorcerors' key advantage is this ability. The mana system not only removes this ability, it shifts the emphasis way over to the side of the wizard. The only way this could be balanced would be to increase PP/MP for sorcerors/psions, and to behave expand their spells/powers known. As it stands it effectively destroys one core class and the fundamentals of an entire supplement BOOK. [/QUOTE]

Verification