Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/18/2013 D&D Next Q&A
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6120519" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I really hope that next edition wants to get finally get rid of this kind of assumptions.</p><p></p><p>This is exactly the kind of assumptions that made 3e so rigid against playstyles that differ from the edition's chosen one. </p><p></p><p>If 5e wants to be inclusive, they really should kill this type of assumptions, all of them or at least as many as possible. It doesn't matter whether the assumption of +1 weapons is much milder than 3e assumption of +N every M levels, they have the same consequence.</p><p></p><p>We should already have had some ideas on how many people do <em>not</em> want to have even +1 weapons in their game, just by reading these forums everyday.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is how it goes exactly when players don't want to be creative, which is a totally legitimate playstyle itself because creativity requires some thinking effort. The beer & pretzel gamestyle is supposed to be relaxing, and many groups want to just bash things without having to think too much, and that's not badwrongfun.</p><p></p><p>But then there are others who prefer a more engaging gamestyle. That's what you get exactly when your most obvious tools (the fighter's weapon, the wizard's spells) stop working as usual, not necessarily stop working at all of course.</p><p></p><p>The game needs to provide unexpected challenges to be engaging for this gamestyle, and immunities are one of the many possibility. There are anyway plenty of other monsters which are instead meeting the expectations and just need to be bashed to death. A good DM learns to use the monsters more appropriate for her group's favourite playstyle.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Would work for me. I like the trend set by the playtest's bestiary of having a sidebar for optional additions to many creatures. If this works well enough for you when you want to ignore those troublesome features, then it works well enough for me when I want to use them!</p><p></p><p>I actually think this could be the best approach for any controversial monster special ability such as <em>energy drain</em>.</p><p></p><p>If we can get an indication of XP adjustment when using the optional special ability, then great, but even if we don't I wouldn't mind that much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6120519, member: 1465"] I really hope that next edition wants to get finally get rid of this kind of assumptions. This is exactly the kind of assumptions that made 3e so rigid against playstyles that differ from the edition's chosen one. If 5e wants to be inclusive, they really should kill this type of assumptions, all of them or at least as many as possible. It doesn't matter whether the assumption of +1 weapons is much milder than 3e assumption of +N every M levels, they have the same consequence. We should already have had some ideas on how many people do [I]not[/I] want to have even +1 weapons in their game, just by reading these forums everyday. This is how it goes exactly when players don't want to be creative, which is a totally legitimate playstyle itself because creativity requires some thinking effort. The beer & pretzel gamestyle is supposed to be relaxing, and many groups want to just bash things without having to think too much, and that's not badwrongfun. But then there are others who prefer a more engaging gamestyle. That's what you get exactly when your most obvious tools (the fighter's weapon, the wizard's spells) stop working as usual, not necessarily stop working at all of course. The game needs to provide unexpected challenges to be engaging for this gamestyle, and immunities are one of the many possibility. There are anyway plenty of other monsters which are instead meeting the expectations and just need to be bashed to death. A good DM learns to use the monsters more appropriate for her group's favourite playstyle. Would work for me. I like the trend set by the playtest's bestiary of having a sidebar for optional additions to many creatures. If this works well enough for you when you want to ignore those troublesome features, then it works well enough for me when I want to use them! I actually think this could be the best approach for any controversial monster special ability such as [I]energy drain[/I]. If we can get an indication of XP adjustment when using the optional special ability, then great, but even if we don't I wouldn't mind that much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/18/2013 D&D Next Q&A
Top