Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/26 Playtest: The Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 9017689" data-attributes="member: 7019027"><p>I'm sorry, but I have a hard time understanding how you have a fighter create a magic weapon and not be magical in their own right. That's like if the wizard cast a spell and the DM counterspelled and the wizard goes "oh, no. I didn't cast a spell, I just used my knowledge of magic to create a magical effect, but I didn't cast magic." </p><p>You might think its cool but it drains the tension out of the scene and you can't take the moment seriously anymore. It'd be like if you were watching an avengers movie and black widow stole the infinity gauntlet out of thanos' hands because she's "the best spy in the world." </p><p>But you really can't describe anything as being fantastical and keep the tone you're going for. No matter what, a serious campaign can't exist with goofy hijinks no matter how epic you try to make it sound. </p><p>Okay, but I'm not talking about attacks. I'm talking about other uses for spell and martial features and there's plenty of room in the design space to give the martials the reliability without the skill check system, but even within the skill check system, there can be reliability. </p><p></p><p>Heck, there's sparks of that right now in 5e. Did you know a Barbarian is guaranteed to be able to break manacles at high levels? Sure, it isn't as epic as even I'd want it to be, but the groundwork is there and we can build from it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 9017689, member: 7019027"] I'm sorry, but I have a hard time understanding how you have a fighter create a magic weapon and not be magical in their own right. That's like if the wizard cast a spell and the DM counterspelled and the wizard goes "oh, no. I didn't cast a spell, I just used my knowledge of magic to create a magical effect, but I didn't cast magic." You might think its cool but it drains the tension out of the scene and you can't take the moment seriously anymore. It'd be like if you were watching an avengers movie and black widow stole the infinity gauntlet out of thanos' hands because she's "the best spy in the world." But you really can't describe anything as being fantastical and keep the tone you're going for. No matter what, a serious campaign can't exist with goofy hijinks no matter how epic you try to make it sound. Okay, but I'm not talking about attacks. I'm talking about other uses for spell and martial features and there's plenty of room in the design space to give the martials the reliability without the skill check system, but even within the skill check system, there can be reliability. Heck, there's sparks of that right now in 5e. Did you know a Barbarian is guaranteed to be able to break manacles at high levels? Sure, it isn't as epic as even I'd want it to be, but the groundwork is there and we can build from it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/26 Playtest: The Fighter
Top