Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/26 Playtest: The Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9018443" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>There is pushback to everything. Do I want the fighter to have spells? No. Do I want them to have abilities that cause saving throws and have DCs? Yes. </p><p></p><p>To some people they will say there is no difference between those two, but just because those people are pushing back doesn't mean I can't make the proposal. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have utterly lost me. First, I asked for what spells just work, and you gave me eyebite... a spell that has a save and doesn't always work. </p><p></p><p>Then you say that all spells that can fail are bad, I give you examples of ones that aren't... and you say they don't punish the user enough and are very powerful.... which again.... like all spells?! Like, what punishment for the user comes from Haste? The caster sufferes nothing. Because it isn't a self-buff spell at all. Using it on yourself is one of the single worst things a caster could do with that spell. </p><p></p><p>And so ultimately... I'm just confused what you want. You seem to just want to get rid of all spells and rewrite the entire spellcasting system. Which, you know, cool, but you keep phrasing it like there are only this small handful of badly designed spells, then talking about universal designs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And how is it absurd? How is it nonsensical? How is it less nonsensical than a creature covered in slippery goo walking through an empty picture frame and teleporting to the ceiling? Living Shadows which can kill you and rip your shadow free to join them in their quest of destruction. Or being able to steal the shadow of a man you killed to take his appearance and memories. All of those things are things IN DND. Right Now. </p><p></p><p>So... why can't DnD support the same types of stories it currently has?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So a medical skill equal to Raise Dead breaks suspension of disbelief. But Raise Dead doesn't, because True Resurrection exists? </p><p></p><p>I'll say it again because I'm very confused. You can't have a medical character with surgical skill equal to Raise Dead, because that breaks suspension of disbelief and is too nonsensical. But Raise Dead is fine, because the more powerful True Ressurrection exists to solve the problems Raise Dead can't. That's the position you want to take here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9018443, member: 6801228"] There is pushback to everything. Do I want the fighter to have spells? No. Do I want them to have abilities that cause saving throws and have DCs? Yes. To some people they will say there is no difference between those two, but just because those people are pushing back doesn't mean I can't make the proposal. You have utterly lost me. First, I asked for what spells just work, and you gave me eyebite... a spell that has a save and doesn't always work. Then you say that all spells that can fail are bad, I give you examples of ones that aren't... and you say they don't punish the user enough and are very powerful.... which again.... like all spells?! Like, what punishment for the user comes from Haste? The caster sufferes nothing. Because it isn't a self-buff spell at all. Using it on yourself is one of the single worst things a caster could do with that spell. And so ultimately... I'm just confused what you want. You seem to just want to get rid of all spells and rewrite the entire spellcasting system. Which, you know, cool, but you keep phrasing it like there are only this small handful of badly designed spells, then talking about universal designs. And how is it absurd? How is it nonsensical? How is it less nonsensical than a creature covered in slippery goo walking through an empty picture frame and teleporting to the ceiling? Living Shadows which can kill you and rip your shadow free to join them in their quest of destruction. Or being able to steal the shadow of a man you killed to take his appearance and memories. All of those things are things IN DND. Right Now. So... why can't DnD support the same types of stories it currently has? So a medical skill equal to Raise Dead breaks suspension of disbelief. But Raise Dead doesn't, because True Resurrection exists? I'll say it again because I'm very confused. You can't have a medical character with surgical skill equal to Raise Dead, because that breaks suspension of disbelief and is too nonsensical. But Raise Dead is fine, because the more powerful True Ressurrection exists to solve the problems Raise Dead can't. That's the position you want to take here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4/26 Playtest: The Fighter
Top