Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
4 Arms and LA+0?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arkhandus" data-source="post: 2149484" data-attributes="member: 13966"><p>Now how do you even propose the character would wield a weapon with four hands? As it is, one-handed and two-handed weapons can't be used with more than two hands. Period. At best a 4-armed character will be wielding two weapons that are each two-handed. With their Strength penalty and Small size, that's still not going to be awesome damage.</p><p></p><p>Examples:</p><p></p><p>1st-level human fighter wields a greatsword. Str 18. Weapon Focus, Power Attack, and Cleave for initial feats. Always uses PA since his WF feat balances out the penalty. So each round he attacks once for 2d6+8 damage, with +5 on the attack roll, whether it's a standard attack or full attack or charge or attack of opportunity or whatever.</p><p></p><p>1st-level Quan-Ri fighter wields two Small greatswords. Str 16. Multi-Weapon Fighting and Power Attack feats. Always uses PA just because he likes to pretend that he's as good as the human fighter. On rounds where he can full-attack, he gets off two strikes at +0 to the attack roll (that's right; +3 Str, +1 size, +1 BAB, -1 PA, -4 for two weapons with neither being light). The Quan-Ri deals 1d8+6 damage per hit with the primary hand, 1d8+3 damage with the off-hand. So on a full-attack, he deals at best 2d8+9 damage, mildly better than the human fighter, but at a much reduced attack bonus.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps a better comparison in this context. 1st-level human fighter wielding two bastard swords. Str 18. Exotic Weapon Proficiency, Two-Weapon Fighting, Power Attack. On a full-attack, gets two attacks at +0 each, deals 1d10+6 damage with the primary hand and 1d10+4 damage with the off-hand. Total of 2d10+10 potential damage. Slightly superior to the Quan-Ri. Spent the human bonus feat on EWP to match and exceed the Quan-Ri's own racial benefit of four arms.</p><p></p><p>Final comparison..... 1st-level Quan-Ri fighter wields four Small bastard swords. Str 16. Multi-Weapon Fighting and Exotic Weapon Proficiency feats. On a full-attack action, he gets four attacks at +1 each, dealing 1d8+3 damage with the primary hand and 1d8+1 damage with each of the three off-hands. Total potential of 4d8+6 damage. Now this is the only terrible scenario.</p><p></p><p>Taking that last scenario into consideration..... The racial Strength penalty should probably be -6, or -4 with an additional -2 Dexterity penalty. This would make it very difficult to get the necessary Str and Dex scores to acquire Multi-Weapon Fighting, Power Attack, Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Bastard Sword or Dwarven Waraxe), and so on. If we went with -6 Strength instead of -2..... Then the first scenario would have the Quan-Ri taking Weapon Focus instead of Power Attack (as their Str would be insufficient at 12), getting two attacks at +2 each for 1d8+1 and 1d8 damage, for a total of 2d8+1 damage, quite reasonable considering the feats and penalties involved (as shown by the example human using two bastard swords; even two longswords or perhaps two shortswords would out-do the Quan-Ri in this case). With -6 Str instead of -2, the later (aka worst case) scenario would have the Quan-Ri wielding four Small longswords, with Str 12 and Weapon Focus, getting 4 attacks at +0 each (+1 size, +1 Str, +1 BAB, +1 WF), each dealing 1d6 damage (though +1 damage for the primary hand). So 4d6+1 damage (avg. 15, max. 25) compared to a human doing 2d10+10 (avg. 21, max. 30). This would make the race quite fair for LA +0 (probably even a bit underpowered considering their Cha penalty and the crippling Str penalty for those PCs who don't invest a base score of 18 into Str to get 12).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arkhandus, post: 2149484, member: 13966"] Now how do you even propose the character would wield a weapon with four hands? As it is, one-handed and two-handed weapons can't be used with more than two hands. Period. At best a 4-armed character will be wielding two weapons that are each two-handed. With their Strength penalty and Small size, that's still not going to be awesome damage. Examples: 1st-level human fighter wields a greatsword. Str 18. Weapon Focus, Power Attack, and Cleave for initial feats. Always uses PA since his WF feat balances out the penalty. So each round he attacks once for 2d6+8 damage, with +5 on the attack roll, whether it's a standard attack or full attack or charge or attack of opportunity or whatever. 1st-level Quan-Ri fighter wields two Small greatswords. Str 16. Multi-Weapon Fighting and Power Attack feats. Always uses PA just because he likes to pretend that he's as good as the human fighter. On rounds where he can full-attack, he gets off two strikes at +0 to the attack roll (that's right; +3 Str, +1 size, +1 BAB, -1 PA, -4 for two weapons with neither being light). The Quan-Ri deals 1d8+6 damage per hit with the primary hand, 1d8+3 damage with the off-hand. So on a full-attack, he deals at best 2d8+9 damage, mildly better than the human fighter, but at a much reduced attack bonus. Perhaps a better comparison in this context. 1st-level human fighter wielding two bastard swords. Str 18. Exotic Weapon Proficiency, Two-Weapon Fighting, Power Attack. On a full-attack, gets two attacks at +0 each, deals 1d10+6 damage with the primary hand and 1d10+4 damage with the off-hand. Total of 2d10+10 potential damage. Slightly superior to the Quan-Ri. Spent the human bonus feat on EWP to match and exceed the Quan-Ri's own racial benefit of four arms. Final comparison..... 1st-level Quan-Ri fighter wields four Small bastard swords. Str 16. Multi-Weapon Fighting and Exotic Weapon Proficiency feats. On a full-attack action, he gets four attacks at +1 each, dealing 1d8+3 damage with the primary hand and 1d8+1 damage with each of the three off-hands. Total potential of 4d8+6 damage. Now this is the only terrible scenario. Taking that last scenario into consideration..... The racial Strength penalty should probably be -6, or -4 with an additional -2 Dexterity penalty. This would make it very difficult to get the necessary Str and Dex scores to acquire Multi-Weapon Fighting, Power Attack, Exotic Weapon Proficiency (Bastard Sword or Dwarven Waraxe), and so on. If we went with -6 Strength instead of -2..... Then the first scenario would have the Quan-Ri taking Weapon Focus instead of Power Attack (as their Str would be insufficient at 12), getting two attacks at +2 each for 1d8+1 and 1d8 damage, for a total of 2d8+1 damage, quite reasonable considering the feats and penalties involved (as shown by the example human using two bastard swords; even two longswords or perhaps two shortswords would out-do the Quan-Ri in this case). With -6 Str instead of -2, the later (aka worst case) scenario would have the Quan-Ri wielding four Small longswords, with Str 12 and Weapon Focus, getting 4 attacks at +0 each (+1 size, +1 Str, +1 BAB, +1 WF), each dealing 1d6 damage (though +1 damage for the primary hand). So 4d6+1 damage (avg. 15, max. 25) compared to a human doing 2d10+10 (avg. 21, max. 30). This would make the race quite fair for LA +0 (probably even a bit underpowered considering their Cha penalty and the crippling Str penalty for those PCs who don't invest a base score of 18 into Str to get 12). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
4 Arms and LA+0?
Top