Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vocenoctum" data-source="post: 3244829" data-attributes="member: 2477">I think the issue wasn't so much the annual itself, but the fact that it was a part of the promised package that was not included. I don't know if any compensation was offered to those that subscribed under the "13 issues a year" plan or not.Again, I don't know, but those that subscribed for a year (of 6 issues), were they given a year (12 issues) or half a year (6 issues) when the change occured. To really debate the point would require an actual "content page count" rather than total page count.Neither of the issues above are an issue for me, so I just inserted a bit of devils advocate. I have however never heard of any problems from Paizo when someone cancled and asked for a refund.My only real problems are that things run in "paths" and when a path gets boring, the magazine is still on that path. I also find that complaints are quite often stifled by overzealous defenders and this has resulted in a lot of little stuff that I dislike getting glossed over in a rush of bashing.I hate all the 4e talk, but sometimes games need to reboot. I think magazines should be continually advancing and changing so as to keep material fresh. For me, lately, the magazines have been boring, though quality.</blockquote>