Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="P1NBACK" data-source="post: 5321072" data-attributes="member: 83768">Aegeri, this is what I've been saying since post one. You've been arguing against DM interpretation for the long haul, and yet here, when CS says, &quot;Yeah, you have to follow the rules for grab&quot; and then you argue with them into giving you the answer YOU want, you're fine with: &quot;The DM can rule otherwise.&quot; We've all been saying this since the beginning. I'm glad you agree. This is a clear example of why &quot;RAW&quot; is a foolish approach to the game - because really, it's more about RAI (like you've decided to game the system).It's just a fundamental approach to the game. Some people approach it like a boardgame/CCG and go with the rules heavy, game the system approach. And, others prefer to use the rules as guidelines for the common sense approach. Play the game how you want. I'll play the game how I want. We can all be happy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="P1NBACK, post: 5321072, member: 83768"] Aegeri, this is what I've been saying since post one. You've been arguing against DM interpretation for the long haul, and yet here, when CS says, "Yeah, you have to follow the rules for grab" and then you argue with them into giving you the answer YOU want, you're fine with: "The DM can rule otherwise." We've all been saying this since the beginning. I'm glad you agree. This is a clear example of why "RAW" is a foolish approach to the game - because really, it's more about RAI (like you've decided to game the system). It's just a fundamental approach to the game. Some people approach it like a boardgame/CCG and go with the rules heavy, game the system approach. And, others prefer to use the rules as guidelines for the common sense approach. Play the game how you want. I'll play the game how I want. We can all be happy. [/QUOTE]

Verification