Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Admiral Caine" data-source="post: 4548105" data-attributes="member: 60438">I believe they were genuinely trying to improve the game, and in the process made it significantly different. Arguably to the point its not the same game, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing if you're trying to sell more product. Please note, there's no judgment implied in my words, only pragmatism. That is, I don't think they made it different just to sell more books, but that is a side effect. I believe they were trying to make a good game. I think they succeeded. And as a Paizo superscriber, I give myself the benefit of the doubt as being unbiased. NOW.. did they take the opportunity to get away from such an open license once they redesigned the game from the ground up? You betchya. Nevertheless, I don't think the intent or motivation was to restrict the license, you see. That was merely an "after the fact" opportunity.</blockquote>