Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4548376" data-attributes="member: 40961">Heh.  You had a prepared response and you used it on me since I was the first responder even though I didn't talk about a sense of entitlement at all, and instead gave specific reasons why the attitudes expressed were objectionable, resulting in everything you wrote making no sense whatsoever.  Classy. I knew where your quote was from because your "trap" was about the most transparent "trick" I've seen in an internet debate since forums were invented.  I googled your text, and read the context.  The OGL FAQ was the first result for the excerpt I cut and pasted.  After reading it, I decided that, for what I was writing, the context didn't change anything.  Which it didn't.  You might have noticed that if you had read what I wrote, instead of gleefully posting your canned response. I stand by what I said.  The OGL is primarily a business document relating to for profit third party publishers.  This does not involve free speech.  And it does not involve the rights of the general public, except tangentially, and in a way that could easily be handled by other approaches.  Conflating all of these issues into one is naive at best, and outright manipulative and dishonest at worst.</blockquote>