Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jon Wake" data-source="post: 4256216" data-attributes="member: 58770"><p>I'm curious.  Looking at the PHB (which I'm sure we all know is more than likely a proof) is anyone else feeling seriously underwhelmed by the art?   I know that a lot of people had problems with the 3e art, but the art I'm seeing for the PHB is decidedly sub-par what WOTC has been putting out in their 3e line.  Now, there is a chance that the copy everyone is looking at 'at a friends house' is the uncorrected proof with placer art, but if not, and when I open the paper PHB and I see some of the shoddy anatomy and dull composition, I have to wonder where WOTC dropped the ball.</p></blockquote><p></p>