Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Personal/Hosted Forums
The Battle of All Alignments
General Discussion
4e Battle of Good & Evil - Rules and OOC Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 4245328" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>Yes, they're very similar, on the same map even. No minions the second time, however. The first encounter has 5 minions, two dragonshields, and a slinger. The second one has 3 dragonshields, a wyrmpriest, and a skirmisher. I quite honestly see no problem in the similarity of the encounters. It makes sense from a plot perspective and the creatures are different enough with different tactics to make the encounter interesting. I doubt the PCs would even remark along the lines of the module designer trying to gain a second encounter for "free", which is what I see the complaint alluding to. It's not, it's well designed within the plot.</p><p></p><p>Major Spoiler I haven't seen posted elsewhere:</p><p>[sblock] There's a spy within the town. The first ambush is a set of kobold brigands. The second ambush is clearly targeting the PCs. They are, according to the module "very disciplined" and have specific tactics to maximize their advantage and the terrain. From a DM's perspective, I can see the PC's overhearing the kobolds during the battle talking about "These are the ones! Get the wizard first!" Assuming they understand draconic, which the kobolds might not realize. [/sblock]</p><p></p><p>I haven't read all the way through, but my first impressions are good. The paper is somewhat thin, it's like a Dragon magazine, but the fact that it's all full color offsets that complete. The cover is also thin, however, and I'm not happy about that part. The maps are awesome, though, and so far I love the design of the adventure.</p><p></p><p>There's extra space devoted to rules, which I understand given the fact that the module comes out before the rules. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>All in all, I'm sold. I want to switch to 4E yesterday. I won't playing 3.5, but I'm certainly not wanting to DM it anymore. With kids and a full time job, I just don't have the time to waste creating bad guys for 3 rounds of combat in 3.5 (my main 3.5 gripe).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 4245328, member: 31734"] Yes, they're very similar, on the same map even. No minions the second time, however. The first encounter has 5 minions, two dragonshields, and a slinger. The second one has 3 dragonshields, a wyrmpriest, and a skirmisher. I quite honestly see no problem in the similarity of the encounters. It makes sense from a plot perspective and the creatures are different enough with different tactics to make the encounter interesting. I doubt the PCs would even remark along the lines of the module designer trying to gain a second encounter for "free", which is what I see the complaint alluding to. It's not, it's well designed within the plot. Major Spoiler I haven't seen posted elsewhere: [sblock] There's a spy within the town. The first ambush is a set of kobold brigands. The second ambush is clearly targeting the PCs. They are, according to the module "very disciplined" and have specific tactics to maximize their advantage and the terrain. From a DM's perspective, I can see the PC's overhearing the kobolds during the battle talking about "These are the ones! Get the wizard first!" Assuming they understand draconic, which the kobolds might not realize. [/sblock] I haven't read all the way through, but my first impressions are good. The paper is somewhat thin, it's like a Dragon magazine, but the fact that it's all full color offsets that complete. The cover is also thin, however, and I'm not happy about that part. The maps are awesome, though, and so far I love the design of the adventure. There's extra space devoted to rules, which I understand given the fact that the module comes out before the rules. :) All in all, I'm sold. I want to switch to 4E yesterday. I won't playing 3.5, but I'm certainly not wanting to DM it anymore. With kids and a full time job, I just don't have the time to waste creating bad guys for 3 rounds of combat in 3.5 (my main 3.5 gripe). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Personal/Hosted Forums
The Battle of All Alignments
General Discussion
4e Battle of Good & Evil - Rules and OOC Discussion
Top