Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4E being immune to criticism (forked from Sentimentality And D&D...)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phloog" data-source="post: 4553120" data-attributes="member: 59219"><p>I think that the proper way to apply any apples/oranges analogy is this:</p><p> </p><p>"I don't like apples, and yet WOTC has begun making apples where before they were making oranges." </p><p> </p><p>In addition, despite the fact that they are now clearly producing apples, they have chosen to continue to label the crates "Oranges". </p><p> </p><p>I will agree that specifics are always better than just 'it doesn't feel like X edition', but I guess I'm not sure how you discuss what you don't like about a newer version of a product without at least the possibiity of discussing what you liked about the old version. To continue to use your fruit analogy but in support of your desire for specifics: perhaps you prefer the color orange, or the lack of a bitter core, or you like the smell of oranges. So I can see a reason to call for specifics. I don't like (for example) the ramped up first level power, the combat focus of ALL classes, the increased emphasis on tactical boardplay, etc.</p><p> </p><p>And of course many wouldn't feel so strongly about any of this if WOTC had not tried to force everyone to produce apples and stop providing oranges, using their market share and resources to convince everyone that apples are indeed the only fruit worth having. If anyone chooses to provide apples, they are legally required to stop producing oranges...that's bound to upset people....</p><p> </p><p>...and can lead to scurvy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phloog, post: 4553120, member: 59219"] I think that the proper way to apply any apples/oranges analogy is this: "I don't like apples, and yet WOTC has begun making apples where before they were making oranges." In addition, despite the fact that they are now clearly producing apples, they have chosen to continue to label the crates "Oranges". I will agree that specifics are always better than just 'it doesn't feel like X edition', but I guess I'm not sure how you discuss what you don't like about a newer version of a product without at least the possibiity of discussing what you liked about the old version. To continue to use your fruit analogy but in support of your desire for specifics: perhaps you prefer the color orange, or the lack of a bitter core, or you like the smell of oranges. So I can see a reason to call for specifics. I don't like (for example) the ramped up first level power, the combat focus of ALL classes, the increased emphasis on tactical boardplay, etc. And of course many wouldn't feel so strongly about any of this if WOTC had not tried to force everyone to produce apples and stop providing oranges, using their market share and resources to convince everyone that apples are indeed the only fruit worth having. If anyone chooses to provide apples, they are legally required to stop producing oranges...that's bound to upset people.... ...and can lead to scurvy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4E being immune to criticism (forked from Sentimentality And D&D...)
Top