Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4E being immune to criticism (forked from Sentimentality And D&D...)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4557007" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>If we are talking about "mundane" as "non-magical" as opposed to "common", I can certainly call Conan mundane. Legolas and Aragorn, no. Gimli, yes. Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin, yes. Boromir, yes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I'm not sure how to parse your response, so let me ask exactly what you mean.</p><p></p><p>Is the problem that I "come here"? Is EN World now a shrine to 4e in your opinion that can hold no dissent? I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that this is not so.</p><p></p><p>Is the problem that I can't see Power X as existing without being magical/mystical in nature? Frankly, it doesn't matter if 2,000 posters give me 4,000,000,000 answers if none of them actually answer my objection. And this has nothing to do with being "disingenious and willfully obstinante", it has to do with what works for me and what does not.</p><p></p><p>To give an example not related to D&D, if I was to give you a recipe for chicken that you did not like, and dozens of posters gave you dozens of reasons why they like it, would you suddenly like that chicken recipe? I guess the answer is "maybe", and the "maybe" would depend very much on whether or not those posters said something that made you reevaluate why you didn't like the recipe. And even if you did reevalute the recipe, it doesn't mean you'd suddenly like it. Seeing the recipe from my viewpoint might not change yours. You might even think (gasp) that your tastes are more important to you than mine are.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps, for example, you are a vegetarian. Then, perhaps, a poster might say something that makes you think, "Hmmm, perhaps I am wrong about this whole vegetarian thing." But not thinking the same isn't disingenous, nor is it obstinant.</p><p></p><p>Really, in order to successfully answer an objection, you first must understand that objection. You have to know <em><strong>why</strong></em> Frosty doesn't want to stay in Florida over the summer before you have any chance whatsoever of convincing Frosty that he is wrong. And, sometimes, just because you love the Florida sun, Frosty might be right. He might not be you. He might be looking at different things. He might not think that the word "martial" is enough to make something not feel like it is magical.</p><p></p><p>If someone is pretty certain that Conan is non-magical, saying Conan is not mundane isn't going to make that person suddenly do a 180 and decide that 4e feels just like a Conan story. Maybe 4e <em><strong>does</strong></em> feel just like a Conan story to you. If so, your experience isn't universal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 4557007, member: 18280"] If we are talking about "mundane" as "non-magical" as opposed to "common", I can certainly call Conan mundane. Legolas and Aragorn, no. Gimli, yes. Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin, yes. Boromir, yes. Well, I'm not sure how to parse your response, so let me ask exactly what you mean. Is the problem that I "come here"? Is EN World now a shrine to 4e in your opinion that can hold no dissent? I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that this is not so. Is the problem that I can't see Power X as existing without being magical/mystical in nature? Frankly, it doesn't matter if 2,000 posters give me 4,000,000,000 answers if none of them actually answer my objection. And this has nothing to do with being "disingenious and willfully obstinante", it has to do with what works for me and what does not. To give an example not related to D&D, if I was to give you a recipe for chicken that you did not like, and dozens of posters gave you dozens of reasons why they like it, would you suddenly like that chicken recipe? I guess the answer is "maybe", and the "maybe" would depend very much on whether or not those posters said something that made you reevaluate why you didn't like the recipe. And even if you did reevalute the recipe, it doesn't mean you'd suddenly like it. Seeing the recipe from my viewpoint might not change yours. You might even think (gasp) that your tastes are more important to you than mine are. Perhaps, for example, you are a vegetarian. Then, perhaps, a poster might say something that makes you think, "Hmmm, perhaps I am wrong about this whole vegetarian thing." But not thinking the same isn't disingenous, nor is it obstinant. Really, in order to successfully answer an objection, you first must understand that objection. You have to know [i][b]why[/b][/i][b][/b] Frosty doesn't want to stay in Florida over the summer before you have any chance whatsoever of convincing Frosty that he is wrong. And, sometimes, just because you love the Florida sun, Frosty might be right. He might not be you. He might be looking at different things. He might not think that the word "martial" is enough to make something not feel like it is magical. If someone is pretty certain that Conan is non-magical, saying Conan is not mundane isn't going to make that person suddenly do a 180 and decide that 4e feels just like a Conan story. Maybe 4e [I][B]does[/B][/I] feel just like a Conan story to you. If so, your experience isn't universal. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4E being immune to criticism (forked from Sentimentality And D&D...)
Top