Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3790279" data-attributes="member: 10177">No, I think it has more to do with legal advice they were given by a certain lawyer who also owns another D&amp;D 3rd party publishing company.&nbsp;&nbsp; Who apparently put the fear of OSRIC into them some time prior to the 2006 GenCon. Or maybe the lawyers business partner conveyed the information/opinion to the Trolls at the 2006 GenCon, in the first day. If OSRIC is so legally questionable I wonder why WOTC has yet to take any action? After about two years of being on the market? Maybe its because OSRIC, the rules themselves, are given away, or sold at cost when printed at Lulu?Don't know for sure, but after WOTC acted so quickly when certain 3rd party publishers violated the OGL early on, I would think if OSRIC was illegal WOTC would have already shut OSRIC down. Especially since WOTC has been aware of OSRIC since day one of its announced existance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 3790279, member: 10177"] No, I think it has more to do with legal advice they were given by a certain lawyer who also owns another D&D 3rd party publishing company. Who apparently put the fear of OSRIC into them some time prior to the 2006 GenCon. Or maybe the lawyers business partner conveyed the information/opinion to the Trolls at the 2006 GenCon, in the first day. If OSRIC is so legally questionable I wonder why WOTC has yet to take any action? After about two years of being on the market? Maybe its because OSRIC, the rules themselves, are given away, or sold at cost when printed at Lulu? Don't know for sure, but after WOTC acted so quickly when certain 3rd party publishers violated the OGL early on, I would think if OSRIC was illegal WOTC would have already shut OSRIC down. Especially since WOTC has been aware of OSRIC since day one of its announced existance. [/QUOTE]

Verification