Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="cangrejoide" data-source="post: 4447322" data-attributes="member: 62237">well it was the  main reason to have those rules in the first place, for any DMs that wanted to run crossover adventures, Murlynd anyone? The 'make stuff up' has been there since the first inception of D&D. ANd I don;t think that not having gun rules in the DMG will prevent new and old DM coming up with their own rules for it. "The inclusion of little incongruous elements" may probably confuse and teach the GM to make bad judgement call in the inclusion of new house rules.And IMHO 4E is a complete introductory game. Gonzo: Bizarre; unconventional.Sounds to me Gonzo is a perfect description of this type of game/setting.Well that certain playstyle is standard D&D, everything else are variants or conceptual different settings ( Eberron, Iron Kingdoms, etc.). But  core D&D is a standard adventure group dealing with monsters with steel & magic. Any variation from this is just a variation, that should be dealt with supplements or house ruling.I call it as I see it.I only added an off comment that 'my failing eyesight is glad for the bigger font.', why do I have to address you whole comment? But apparently I have to, don't I?Well:I don't care if they have more or less pages, as long as they deliver a good complete book. Which they did.</blockquote>