Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e Encounter Design Applied to 3e (Forked: 4e Combat Frustrating Instead of Fun?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 4366311" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4366089" target="_blank"> 4e Combat Frustrating Instead of Fun? </a></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, I threw this out and then decided I wanted to follow up on the idea.</p><p></p><p>I like the encounter design in 4e. It really isn't <u>that</u> different than 3.5, when you think about it: Here's your goal, each critter counts for x. The major factor is that 4e has a somewhat different baseline: 5 critters for 5 PCs. Since I just happen to have 5 players, I took note at that and started adjusting my thinking, and it's been making encounter design a bit easier.</p><p></p><p>My group is 5 PCs and a henchman, so 6 party members. That means I really need to think of them as +1 level. The party is also 15th level and generally balanced.</p><p></p><p>The 3.5 method of encounter building says to look for an EL 16, prefer a single CR 16 creature. If you need to, two CR 14 creatures can be substituted. Bosses can be 18th or 19th, tops.</p><p></p><p>The 4e method says to look for 5 "standard" opponents and substitute more or less powerful instances, as needed. So, the first question I had to ask was "what CR monster in 3.5 in equivalent to a 'standard' monster in 4e?" The answer I settled on, for a party of 6 PCs, was (party level -2), or 13. That's something of a wild guess, but it seems to be holding up.</p><p></p><p>From there, I decided that minions are standard-2, elites are standard+2, and solo are standard+4. I'm playing with the idea of refining that by fixing the hit dice with standard as listed in the MM, elites at 3/4 of max, and solos as max. I'm not sure about that last part, yet, and it'll probably be something that gets adjusted with play.</p><p></p><p>I know the math doesn't seem quite right, but it does seem to work. A single storm giant (CR13), for example, isn't a significant threat to a single 15th level character. To only use two against a balanced party would be absurd.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, for my group, that means my encounter builds are now based on starting with an assumed 5 critters of CR 13. Two could be swapped out for a CR 15 critter, or four CR 11 critters could be added in place of one of the originals.</p><p></p><p>Doing all of the above would result in an elite commander, two guards, and four grunts. By 3.5 standards, that's an EL of 17 or 18, but the over all play seems to be better than that number would suggest. A standard party of four might necessitate lowering all the CRs by 1.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts? Like I said, it's not revolutionary, but I am finding it much easier and faster to build interesting encounters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 4366311, member: 5100"] Forked from: [url=http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4366089] 4e Combat Frustrating Instead of Fun? [/url] So, I threw this out and then decided I wanted to follow up on the idea. I like the encounter design in 4e. It really isn't [u]that[/u] different than 3.5, when you think about it: Here's your goal, each critter counts for x. The major factor is that 4e has a somewhat different baseline: 5 critters for 5 PCs. Since I just happen to have 5 players, I took note at that and started adjusting my thinking, and it's been making encounter design a bit easier. My group is 5 PCs and a henchman, so 6 party members. That means I really need to think of them as +1 level. The party is also 15th level and generally balanced. The 3.5 method of encounter building says to look for an EL 16, prefer a single CR 16 creature. If you need to, two CR 14 creatures can be substituted. Bosses can be 18th or 19th, tops. The 4e method says to look for 5 "standard" opponents and substitute more or less powerful instances, as needed. So, the first question I had to ask was "what CR monster in 3.5 in equivalent to a 'standard' monster in 4e?" The answer I settled on, for a party of 6 PCs, was (party level -2), or 13. That's something of a wild guess, but it seems to be holding up. From there, I decided that minions are standard-2, elites are standard+2, and solo are standard+4. I'm playing with the idea of refining that by fixing the hit dice with standard as listed in the MM, elites at 3/4 of max, and solos as max. I'm not sure about that last part, yet, and it'll probably be something that gets adjusted with play. I know the math doesn't seem quite right, but it does seem to work. A single storm giant (CR13), for example, isn't a significant threat to a single 15th level character. To only use two against a balanced party would be absurd. Anyway, for my group, that means my encounter builds are now based on starting with an assumed 5 critters of CR 13. Two could be swapped out for a CR 15 critter, or four CR 11 critters could be added in place of one of the originals. Doing all of the above would result in an elite commander, two guards, and four grunts. By 3.5 standards, that's an EL of 17 or 18, but the over all play seems to be better than that number would suggest. A standard party of four might necessitate lowering all the CRs by 1. Thoughts? Like I said, it's not revolutionary, but I am finding it much easier and faster to build interesting encounters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
4e Encounter Design Applied to 3e (Forked: 4e Combat Frustrating Instead of Fun?)
Top