Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Xorn" data-source="post: 4130731" data-attributes="member: 61231">I see no reason that a FG2 ruleset won't be created for 4E.&nbsp; It will have a character sheet and combat tracker.&nbsp; That's about it.&nbsp; It will have no information in it that allows you to play 4E without the books.There won't be a handy-dandy SRD module like there is for 3.5, but there will be a ruleset (such a misleading name) that includes a character sheet.&nbsp; It will be developed by the 4E community I'm sure (since I'm going to help with it), and I'm sure it's not going to break anything in the OGL once we see it.I mean, there's already a &quot;Generic Ruleset&quot; for FG2.&nbsp; It's got a generic character sheet, and a generic combat tracker.&nbsp; I'm already running 4E fan playtest/demos using the default d20 ruleset with NO issues, so I don't see this having any impact on FG2.&nbsp; (Or MapTool, or Battlegrounds RPG--all fantastic VTTs.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Xorn, post: 4130731, member: 61231"] I see no reason that a FG2 ruleset won't be created for 4E. It will have a character sheet and combat tracker. That's about it. It will have no information in it that allows you to play 4E without the books. There won't be a handy-dandy SRD module like there is for 3.5, but there will be a ruleset (such a misleading name) that includes a character sheet. It will be developed by the 4E community I'm sure (since I'm going to help with it), and I'm sure it's not going to break anything in the OGL once we see it. I mean, there's already a "Generic Ruleset" for FG2. It's got a generic character sheet, and a generic combat tracker. I'm already running 4E fan playtest/demos using the default d20 ruleset with NO issues, so I don't see this having any impact on FG2. (Or MapTool, or Battlegrounds RPG--all fantastic VTTs.) [/QUOTE]

Verification