Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
4E Gestalt in play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halivar" data-source="post: 4856350" data-attributes="member: 9327"><p>A couple weeks ago, I tried an experiment: I ported the 3.5 gestalt rules over to 4E, with some necessary caveats, had my players make a couple level 8 gestalt characters, and tested them out in play.</p><p></p><p>First, I had each player roll standard (4d6-drop-1), but had them take the best two stats, and make them both 18's (to fight MAD and allow them to pick classes that don't synergize on the same stat).</p><p></p><p>Then I had them pick two classes. For each class, take the better of the two in defenses, hit-points, etc, take all the class abilities for both, but only retain a single line of feats.</p><p></p><p>For each class, they received all the powers they were entitled to for that level. IOW, they had 4 at-wills, 6 encounters, 4 dailies, and 4 utility powers.</p><p></p><p>The first effect in the game was expected: against monsters of their own level, they destroyed with aplomb. Minions, in particular, were shredded quite easily because they weren't as cautious with their dailies.</p><p></p><p>The characters in play were a Rogue/Sorceror, a Wizard/Swordmage, and a Paladin/Barbarian. The Wizard/Swordmage was an effective damage dealer (hit him, take damage; don't hit him, provoke a teleport attack). The Paladin/Barbarian was also brutal.</p><p></p><p>The three characters took on a level 10 Solo and took it down quickly, though at the loss of the Rogue/Sorceror, who died. Dice rolls were average, and probably indicative of normal, regular play.</p><p></p><p>The result is that gestalt seems to work VERY well with a limited number of players. With someone having a Cleric gestalt, the party probably would have come out whole. Players appreciated not having to ration so much, and felt very empowered. At the same time, bumping up the level of the monsters by 2 seemed to provide an appropriate challenge for them, so they got nothing for free. The biggest plus, of course, was the gestalt class-flavor-mixing goodness from 3.x.</p><p></p><p>I intend to run a short campaign in the future using these rules to see how they work at lower levels, also.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halivar, post: 4856350, member: 9327"] A couple weeks ago, I tried an experiment: I ported the 3.5 gestalt rules over to 4E, with some necessary caveats, had my players make a couple level 8 gestalt characters, and tested them out in play. First, I had each player roll standard (4d6-drop-1), but had them take the best two stats, and make them both 18's (to fight MAD and allow them to pick classes that don't synergize on the same stat). Then I had them pick two classes. For each class, take the better of the two in defenses, hit-points, etc, take all the class abilities for both, but only retain a single line of feats. For each class, they received all the powers they were entitled to for that level. IOW, they had 4 at-wills, 6 encounters, 4 dailies, and 4 utility powers. The first effect in the game was expected: against monsters of their own level, they destroyed with aplomb. Minions, in particular, were shredded quite easily because they weren't as cautious with their dailies. The characters in play were a Rogue/Sorceror, a Wizard/Swordmage, and a Paladin/Barbarian. The Wizard/Swordmage was an effective damage dealer (hit him, take damage; don't hit him, provoke a teleport attack). The Paladin/Barbarian was also brutal. The three characters took on a level 10 Solo and took it down quickly, though at the loss of the Rogue/Sorceror, who died. Dice rolls were average, and probably indicative of normal, regular play. The result is that gestalt seems to work VERY well with a limited number of players. With someone having a Cleric gestalt, the party probably would have come out whole. Players appreciated not having to ration so much, and felt very empowered. At the same time, bumping up the level of the monsters by 2 seemed to provide an appropriate challenge for them, so they got nothing for free. The biggest plus, of course, was the gestalt class-flavor-mixing goodness from 3.x. I intend to run a short campaign in the future using these rules to see how they work at lower levels, also. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
4E Gestalt in play
Top