Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4e Healing was the best D&D healing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8034438" data-attributes="member: 72555"><p>4e character's "health" was in their healing surges. HP was just what it would take them out of this fight.</p><p></p><p>In 4e, magic can enhance your health, not replace it.</p><p></p><p>In almost every other edition of D&D, healing that a single healer can do is ridiculously larger than the HP any warrior can have. In general, adding a healer is a better way to increase your teams HP pool than adding a tough PC.</p><p></p><p>4e breaks this. Because healing just augments your natural toughness, instead of replacing it, having more "tough" PCs actually makes your team tougher. Adding more healers doesn't do this <strong>as much</strong> as adding more tough PCs.</p><p></p><p>Healer healing is <strong>more efficient</strong> than natural healing, but it is also a limited resource. So more healers give you more of that limited resource. Healer healing also gives you access to more healing in a fight, while natural healing occurs between fights mostly.</p><p></p><p>4e heals are large, even at low levels. Two heals brings back someone almost KO'd to full HP. You have a limited number you can use in a fight however, so you use them strategically.</p><p></p><p>Ideally, the front-line tough fighter gets modestly focused, and when the enemy scores a lucky blow you keep them up. Alternatively, when the enemy collapses your flank and threatens your wizard, you drop a heal on them to buy time for your warriors to protect the wizard (or for the wizard to protect themselves).</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>Because your in-combat HP are relatively smaller than your adventuring day total HP pool, fights are more threatening even if they don't exhaust you for the adventuring day. You are always an unlucky round or two away from being knocked out. Fragile characters even moreso; they have lower AC, fewer defensive abilities, and significantly less HP.</p><p></p><p>A tough warrior type will usually have more AC, and ways to generate temporary HP or mitigate damage, more HP, and often a few in-combat "self heals" for tough scrapes. Instead of 2 rounds from being in the dirt, they are 3 unlucky rounds from being in the dirt.</p><p></p><p>Then, after the fight, everyone cleans up and is ready for another one.</p><p></p><p>4e combat structure is also built to enhance that stress. Early in a fight, players have limited "extra oomph" resources, while monsters have more numbers. This places a lot of tactical stress on the PCs; if all 5 orcs focus on the wizard, the wizard could drop right away.</p><p></p><p>Then the players unleash hell, an orc or two drops, and the tactical situation switches. The players "snatch victory from the jaws of defeat" with huge regularity; an "even" fight almost always looks like the PCs are in trouble early on, then the PCs come from behind.</p><p></p><p>4e's major flaws includes that they didn't do enough to trim the per-turn action economy of monsters and players. So the game could drag on; even a 5 round fight could take far far too long, as each player is doing tactical positioning, using suites of tricks, and reacting on their off-turn.</p><p></p><p>And when every fight feels like a nailbiter, eventually you get used to it, and they don't feel like nailbiters anymore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotAYakk, post: 8034438, member: 72555"] 4e character's "health" was in their healing surges. HP was just what it would take them out of this fight. In 4e, magic can enhance your health, not replace it. In almost every other edition of D&D, healing that a single healer can do is ridiculously larger than the HP any warrior can have. In general, adding a healer is a better way to increase your teams HP pool than adding a tough PC. 4e breaks this. Because healing just augments your natural toughness, instead of replacing it, having more "tough" PCs actually makes your team tougher. Adding more healers doesn't do this [b]as much[/b] as adding more tough PCs. Healer healing is [b]more efficient[/b] than natural healing, but it is also a limited resource. So more healers give you more of that limited resource. Healer healing also gives you access to more healing in a fight, while natural healing occurs between fights mostly. 4e heals are large, even at low levels. Two heals brings back someone almost KO'd to full HP. You have a limited number you can use in a fight however, so you use them strategically. Ideally, the front-line tough fighter gets modestly focused, and when the enemy scores a lucky blow you keep them up. Alternatively, when the enemy collapses your flank and threatens your wizard, you drop a heal on them to buy time for your warriors to protect the wizard (or for the wizard to protect themselves). ... Because your in-combat HP are relatively smaller than your adventuring day total HP pool, fights are more threatening even if they don't exhaust you for the adventuring day. You are always an unlucky round or two away from being knocked out. Fragile characters even moreso; they have lower AC, fewer defensive abilities, and significantly less HP. A tough warrior type will usually have more AC, and ways to generate temporary HP or mitigate damage, more HP, and often a few in-combat "self heals" for tough scrapes. Instead of 2 rounds from being in the dirt, they are 3 unlucky rounds from being in the dirt. Then, after the fight, everyone cleans up and is ready for another one. 4e combat structure is also built to enhance that stress. Early in a fight, players have limited "extra oomph" resources, while monsters have more numbers. This places a lot of tactical stress on the PCs; if all 5 orcs focus on the wizard, the wizard could drop right away. Then the players unleash hell, an orc or two drops, and the tactical situation switches. The players "snatch victory from the jaws of defeat" with huge regularity; an "even" fight almost always looks like the PCs are in trouble early on, then the PCs come from behind. 4e's major flaws includes that they didn't do enough to trim the per-turn action economy of monsters and players. So the game could drag on; even a 5 round fight could take far far too long, as each player is doing tactical positioning, using suites of tricks, and reacting on their off-turn. And when every fight feels like a nailbiter, eventually you get used to it, and they don't feel like nailbiters anymore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4e Healing was the best D&D healing
Top