Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4e Healing was the best D&D healing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 8046022" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>Again, a cherry-picked example to cast the model in the worst possible light. The model isn't specifically designed to cover that specific scenario, though. Detailing every possible interaction would be boring and tedious, for very little benefit. Instead, we have a streamlined model that works in the vast majority of cases, with a minimum of fuss. (And which suffers from a couple of nit-picky corner-case problems, if you really want to obsess over minutiae.)</p><p></p><p>We're not trying to model a substantive hit with an edged weapon that bypasses armor, though. Getting hit by an axe, with no armor (or other factors, like magic) to mitigate it, cannot reasonably result in anything other than serious injury. It's only the existence of armor (or magic) which provides the necessary room for reasonable doubt.</p><p></p><p>And what's wrong with that model? It will get us to the same end-point, either way, but with significantly less math required. One of the major reasons why death spirals are pointless is because they tend to cancel each other out, as often as not. Even if we were modeling pain and bruises and slowed reaction times, the pro is going to even that out as soon as they get a good hit in.</p><p></p><p>Aside from Daily powers, a fighter who spends hit dice or healing surges to recover <em>is</em> operating at full capacity for the duration of the second fight. <em>Everything</em> that happened to them as a result of the first fight is wiped clean. It doesn't matter whether they were literally one good hit away from unconsciousness, because five minutes (or an hour) later, they may as well have been resting in Tahiti for three months. And that completely trivializes the fact that they were hit in the first place. Once those HP are back, the fact that they were ever gone is entirely irrelevant. (It might theoretically matter around the fourth fight of the same day, or the next morning after six fights in one day, but it's entirely irrelevant <em>now</em>; and it will only ever become relevant for five minutes at the end of the day.)</p><p></p><p>The fundamental problem underlying this whole debate is that it's all-or-nothing. Each edition only has one set of rules for healing, without regard for the circumstances in which the HP were lost. If (for the sake of argument) we take for granted that HP totals include both physical toughness, as well as fatigue and other factors; then a rule that makes sense in the context of a physical hit does not make sense in the context of a near miss, and vice versa. </p><p></p><p>The only way to make sense of the unified healing rules it is to go with one extreme or the other - either every hit is physical or none of them are. Either a tough-enough warrior can take quite a number of substantive physical hits before falling, or nobody can stay up through <em>any</em> number of substantive physical hits regardless of how tough they're supposed to be. </p><p></p><p>And while it's possible to have a serious world where a number of specific heroes are effectively Made of Iron, it is not really possible to take a world seriously when every single person living there is Made of Plasticine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 8046022, member: 6775031"] Again, a cherry-picked example to cast the model in the worst possible light. The model isn't specifically designed to cover that specific scenario, though. Detailing every possible interaction would be boring and tedious, for very little benefit. Instead, we have a streamlined model that works in the vast majority of cases, with a minimum of fuss. (And which suffers from a couple of nit-picky corner-case problems, if you really want to obsess over minutiae.) We're not trying to model a substantive hit with an edged weapon that bypasses armor, though. Getting hit by an axe, with no armor (or other factors, like magic) to mitigate it, cannot reasonably result in anything other than serious injury. It's only the existence of armor (or magic) which provides the necessary room for reasonable doubt. And what's wrong with that model? It will get us to the same end-point, either way, but with significantly less math required. One of the major reasons why death spirals are pointless is because they tend to cancel each other out, as often as not. Even if we were modeling pain and bruises and slowed reaction times, the pro is going to even that out as soon as they get a good hit in. Aside from Daily powers, a fighter who spends hit dice or healing surges to recover [I]is[/I] operating at full capacity for the duration of the second fight. [I]Everything[/I] that happened to them as a result of the first fight is wiped clean. It doesn't matter whether they were literally one good hit away from unconsciousness, because five minutes (or an hour) later, they may as well have been resting in Tahiti for three months. And that completely trivializes the fact that they were hit in the first place. Once those HP are back, the fact that they were ever gone is entirely irrelevant. (It might theoretically matter around the fourth fight of the same day, or the next morning after six fights in one day, but it's entirely irrelevant [I]now[/I]; and it will only ever become relevant for five minutes at the end of the day.) The fundamental problem underlying this whole debate is that it's all-or-nothing. Each edition only has one set of rules for healing, without regard for the circumstances in which the HP were lost. If (for the sake of argument) we take for granted that HP totals include both physical toughness, as well as fatigue and other factors; then a rule that makes sense in the context of a physical hit does not make sense in the context of a near miss, and vice versa. The only way to make sense of the unified healing rules it is to go with one extreme or the other - either every hit is physical or none of them are. Either a tough-enough warrior can take quite a number of substantive physical hits before falling, or nobody can stay up through [I]any[/I] number of substantive physical hits regardless of how tough they're supposed to be. And while it's possible to have a serious world where a number of specific heroes are effectively Made of Iron, it is not really possible to take a world seriously when every single person living there is Made of Plasticine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4e Healing was the best D&D healing
Top