Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ranger REG" data-source="post: 2233656" data-attributes="member: 533">Hmm. Then perhaps for insurance, we should set up a legal defense fund to protect the Open Gaming License. Perhaps that this should be the Open Gaming Foundation's new purpose.BTW, that lawsuit you mentioned, Hasbro didn't release a royalty-free trademark license for their Monopoly game, so that should have been ruled in Hasbro's favor.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":]" title="Devious&nbsp; &nbsp; :]" data-shortname=":]" /> Are these the same people who claimed George Lucas ruined their childhood for releasing the Prequel Trilogy?&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> Regarding the rumor of a certain WizO, I didn't catch his or her name. I'd like to hear straight from this person.One shouldn't trust anyone in any business, even that mom-n-pop store in your neighborhood. They're trying to make money any way they can, pure and simple.I personally believe that the fan community might be giving companies mixed signals. While I can only speak for myself, I never asked for 3.5e back in 2002. I never demanded any kind of revision for D&amp;D Third Edition. Yet WotC must have heard demands for it from their fanbase.Now, we're getting discussion threads about 4e. Mixed signals? Or is there a growing voice in our community that want yet another edition? They must be financially rich, farting $$$ out of their arse to want to spend $90 again. Is there dissatisfaction over the recent version to warrant such a demand?Now, I have nothing but contempt for that faction of our community.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ranger REG, post: 2233656, member: 533"] Hmm. Then perhaps for insurance, we should set up a legal defense fund to protect the Open Gaming License. Perhaps that this should be the Open Gaming Foundation's new purpose. BTW, that lawsuit you mentioned, Hasbro didn't release a royalty-free trademark license for their [i]Monopoly[/i] game, so that should have been ruled in Hasbro's favor. :] Are these the same people who claimed George Lucas ruined their childhood for releasing the Prequel Trilogy? :p Regarding the rumor of a certain WizO, I didn't catch his or her name. I'd like to hear straight from this person. One shouldn't trust anyone in any business, even that mom-n-pop store in your neighborhood. They're trying to make money any way they can, pure and simple. I personally believe that the fan community might be giving companies mixed signals. While I can only speak for myself, I never asked for 3.5e back in 2002. I never demanded any kind of revision for [i]D&D Third Edition.[/i] Yet WotC must have heard demands for it from their fanbase. Now, we're getting discussion threads about 4e. Mixed signals? Or is there a growing voice in our community that want yet another edition? They must be financially rich, farting $$$ out of their arse to want to spend $90 again. Is there dissatisfaction over the recent version to warrant such a demand? Now, I have nothing but contempt for that faction of our community. [/QUOTE]

Verification