Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Brasswatchman" data-source="post: 4267561" data-attributes="member: 36967">Yeah, I can tell just by looking around that 4e is pretty controversial. I'm not talking about here, though -- I'm talking about the greater world. Is anyone else worried that D&D 4e might end up the target of more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Pulling" target="_blank">Patricia Pulling</a>/Jack Chick/BADD-style attacks?Think about it for a second. Warlock is now a core class - which involves getting magical power from a deal with devils. (and yes, you don't have to play the class that way -- but since when has that ever mattered in the world of sound bites?) The PHB now includes lists of possible magical Rituals (not real ones, of course, but again, since when has that ever mattered?). Tieflings are a core race, allowing you to literally play a character with a demonic background.Is anyone else worried about this? I mean, this stuff hasn't gone away - just look at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter" target="_blank">Harry Potter</a> stuff for proof...Edit: And just to be clear here, I don't think this way myself (well, to the given extent you could consider it "thought," anyway...) -- what I'm worried about here is that Wizards might be making itself a target. And us, too, if only by association...</blockquote>