Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
4e - Is the Terminology the Problem?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 4101077" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>There's another possibility, however, which is that the speaker is trying to communicate but doing a bad job of it. In which case it is still the speaker's fault that communication fails.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's all very well if you are in fact communicating two ways--though it's still very bad form to use a lot of terms that you know will require explanation. You shouldn't have to issue your listeners a dictionary to understand what you're saying, nor should you be constantly stopping to explain your terms. Use language appropriate to your audience.</p><p></p><p>However, a written book, like the D&D rulebooks, is NOT two-way communication. It goes one direction only, writer to reader. So you have to make assumptions about what your audience will and will not understand. The burden is on the writer to estimate the reader's knowledge and write accordingly.</p><p></p><p>If I write a book for children to be published in Australia, and mention the United States Electoral College without explaining what it is, and most of the Aussie kids reading my book assume I'm talking about an institution of higher learning--that isn't their fault. It's my fault. As the writer, I know (or ought to!) that Australian children aren't going to know about the intricacies of the U.S. political system. If knowledge of the Electoral College is at all important to the story, my book should explain what the heck it is.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, if I write a book for political science professors in the U.S., then I can talk about the Electoral College without including an explanation. It is safe for me to assume that my audience knows what the Electoral College is.</p><p></p><p>The key is knowing your audience. As I said--if I use a word to mean Y, when I <em>know</em> my audience expects it to mean X, it's my fault if they don't get what I'm saying. If I <em>don't</em> know what my audience expects, then the question becomes whether I could reasonably have been expected to know. If the answer is yes, it's still my fault for failing to learn about my audience. If the answer is no, then and only then should the audience be held responsible.</p><p></p><p>As a rule, if one is addressing a large audience, and most of the audience does not understand, it is much more likely to be the speaker who's at fault.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 4101077, member: 58197"] There's another possibility, however, which is that the speaker is trying to communicate but doing a bad job of it. In which case it is still the speaker's fault that communication fails. That's all very well if you are in fact communicating two ways--though it's still very bad form to use a lot of terms that you know will require explanation. You shouldn't have to issue your listeners a dictionary to understand what you're saying, nor should you be constantly stopping to explain your terms. Use language appropriate to your audience. However, a written book, like the D&D rulebooks, is NOT two-way communication. It goes one direction only, writer to reader. So you have to make assumptions about what your audience will and will not understand. The burden is on the writer to estimate the reader's knowledge and write accordingly. If I write a book for children to be published in Australia, and mention the United States Electoral College without explaining what it is, and most of the Aussie kids reading my book assume I'm talking about an institution of higher learning--that isn't their fault. It's my fault. As the writer, I know (or ought to!) that Australian children aren't going to know about the intricacies of the U.S. political system. If knowledge of the Electoral College is at all important to the story, my book should explain what the heck it is. On the other hand, if I write a book for political science professors in the U.S., then I can talk about the Electoral College without including an explanation. It is safe for me to assume that my audience knows what the Electoral College is. The key is knowing your audience. As I said--if I use a word to mean Y, when I [i]know[/i] my audience expects it to mean X, it's my fault if they don't get what I'm saying. If I [I]don't[/I] know what my audience expects, then the question becomes whether I could reasonably have been expected to know. If the answer is yes, it's still my fault for failing to learn about my audience. If the answer is no, then and only then should the audience be held responsible. As a rule, if one is addressing a large audience, and most of the audience does not understand, it is much more likely to be the speaker who's at fault. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
4e - Is the Terminology the Problem?
Top