Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wiman" data-source="post: 4109206" data-attributes="member: 61261">Spot on, Spot on and Cheers.Completely agree with this. I believe one of the possible disadvantages that 3.X edition and even 2nd edition brought in was a players and DMs reliance on the rules to play the game. (please note this is not true of most players and DMs but is of some) - Earlier editions had little in line of structure and were perhaps better at portraying creativity because every game back then was made of house rules...in fact I don't even remember refering to them as house rules they were simply the game to us. You had to come up with options to play the game and I think that 4e is coming back to this.Before anyone says it I don't want to hear the "If I spend this much money, I want everything to work out for my game exactly the way I want it....." My problem with this arguement is there is alot of "I's" in it for a game designed for a mass audience. Subtle tweaks on any rules will may a "good" system (which in my opinion 4e is turning out to be) a great system for individual tastes....even if it takes us a couple hours of our time to custumize a few things we dislike the rewards are much more then a couple hours complaining on the boards to mostly deaf ears.</blockquote>