Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Soel" data-source="post: 4097011" data-attributes="member: 30024">Fear - that the marking/conditions during combat will be just as difficult as similar things were in 3eFear - that Psionics, when it appears, will be far less innovative than it was in the XPH and will just seem like another wizard. I really am weighing the pros and cons of just using 3.5 psionics in a 4e game.Fear - that the drive to define exact roles for the classes doesn't stifle creativity (though this is probably the easiest to deal with)Fear - where do we go from here? Tome of Battle and its contemporaries helped folks shape 3.5 into desirable use. The similarity of 4e classes' powers just seems to me that future classes must all be built in the exact same model, and I worry that too much similarity can actually be a bad thing. I don't think it'd be so easy to o a TOB-esque book for those who aren't as happy with 4e. (third party companies might save us, though!)</blockquote>