Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jhaelen" data-source="post: 4519871" data-attributes="member: 46713">Well, I mostly liked that there _were_ psionic dragons. I never understood why they had to be _gem_ dragons, though, just like I never understood the connection between crystal and psionics.I never cared for metallic dragons, btw.My preferred implementation for dragons would have been stats for a 'true dragon' at several sizes/age categories as a standard monster plus a set of templates to create specific types of dragons (incidentally turning them into Elite monsters).If you want to create a particularly intelligent or 'special' dragon, add another template (one of the existing, general ones, e.g. the npc ones).I know it's a sacred cow, but I never liked how D&D linked a dragon's colour to it's type and thus it's set of abilities.</blockquote>