Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4e, Non-Martial Characters, and Limited Feat Choices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 4269182" data-attributes="member: 29014"><p>Several people have mentioned this Str-tertiary thing, but it's not the case that it would help the character. Actually, the advice from the PH to make Str tertiary is not helpful in this case. I did indeed see it, but it would not have helped. It opens up one good feat option (Light Shield Proficiency) at an incredible cost that is not worth it.</p><p></p><p>Let's say that I was going to make Strength my tertiary stat, following their advice exactly and having Wis and Cha highest and then Str next. Right now, my tertiary is Con. I need 5 points to get Strength up to 13. So I'll keep My Wis and Cha and lower Con until I have 13 Str.</p><p></p><p>The net gain from this is that I can take Light Shield Proficiency now if I want (unfortunately, I still can't take any of the other armour feats because they also use Con or Heavy Shield uses 15 Str).</p><p></p><p>What do I lose? First off, -4 HP (and thus 1 less per surge), -2 surges per day, -2 to Fort saves. That's nearly the same as saying that my character gets Toughness (4/5 of it at least), Durable, and Great Fort (which is a Paragon feat) as three free bonus feats over the Str tertiary character. I also lose -2 to hit with my Star Warlock multiclass. The Str tertiary character still has Str that is far too low to actually use Str Cleric powers enough to choose them, so the gain from that is negligible.</p><p></p><p>So no, I'd say the advice they give is unwise to follow. As I mentioned above, the character could be reasonably effective without feats. It's annoying not to be able to pick any feats, but it doesn't mean she's weak. In fact, I'd posit that if she grabs three Skill Trainings or something for more versatility, she'll be strictly better than a Cleric who listened to them and took Str and then had to grab Toughness, Durable, and Great Fortitude to make up the lost ground. </p><p></p><p>I've never argued that my Cleric can't be effective--It's the constrained choices that are quite annoying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 4269182, member: 29014"] Several people have mentioned this Str-tertiary thing, but it's not the case that it would help the character. Actually, the advice from the PH to make Str tertiary is not helpful in this case. I did indeed see it, but it would not have helped. It opens up one good feat option (Light Shield Proficiency) at an incredible cost that is not worth it. Let's say that I was going to make Strength my tertiary stat, following their advice exactly and having Wis and Cha highest and then Str next. Right now, my tertiary is Con. I need 5 points to get Strength up to 13. So I'll keep My Wis and Cha and lower Con until I have 13 Str. The net gain from this is that I can take Light Shield Proficiency now if I want (unfortunately, I still can't take any of the other armour feats because they also use Con or Heavy Shield uses 15 Str). What do I lose? First off, -4 HP (and thus 1 less per surge), -2 surges per day, -2 to Fort saves. That's nearly the same as saying that my character gets Toughness (4/5 of it at least), Durable, and Great Fort (which is a Paragon feat) as three free bonus feats over the Str tertiary character. I also lose -2 to hit with my Star Warlock multiclass. The Str tertiary character still has Str that is far too low to actually use Str Cleric powers enough to choose them, so the gain from that is negligible. So no, I'd say the advice they give is unwise to follow. As I mentioned above, the character could be reasonably effective without feats. It's annoying not to be able to pick any feats, but it doesn't mean she's weak. In fact, I'd posit that if she grabs three Skill Trainings or something for more versatility, she'll be strictly better than a Cleric who listened to them and took Str and then had to grab Toughness, Durable, and Great Fortitude to make up the lost ground. I've never argued that my Cleric can't be effective--It's the constrained choices that are quite annoying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4e, Non-Martial Characters, and Limited Feat Choices
Top