Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E Oldschool
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Syrsuro" data-source="post: 4923157" data-attributes="member: 58162"><p>After playing 4E for over a year (and 3.5 for several years before that) I have finally come to grips with what it is that makes me yearn quietly for the older school systems (O/AD&D)and why I see both 3.x and 4E as serious departures from that.</p><p> </p><p>And no, I don't want to get into system bashing - that isn't the point. People like what they like.</p><p> </p><p>In my case, although I like many things about 4E I do see a major shift in what the players <em>do</em> during a play session. Not one mandated by the rules and not one that couldn't be avoided in theory. But one that, none-the-less was due to the game mechanics.</p><p> </p><p>In the older games, combats were shorter. Now this seems so obvious, that it hardly needs to be said. It wasn't difficult to fit 10 or more combat encounters into a game session. But was is often missed is that those 10 or more combat encounters <em>still</em> took up only around half of the game time. The rest was spent exploring and interacting with the environment (both physical and social). This is the reason why many people say that there is less roleplaying in 4E - it isn't that there needs to be, it is just that combats are these huge, monolithic blocks of time which tend to not leave as much time for anything else (unless you decide to cut back on the number of combats which, although fine for some, doesn't actually represent how the game was played - at least not in my experience.</p><p> </p><p>Which brings me to the change I am considering for some areas...</p><p> </p><p>Create an area with some reason why resting (even 5 minute rests) are not viable. This reason can be wandering monsters, hazardous effects (extreme cold) or whatever. </p><p> </p><p>Decide on the monsters that will populate this area and modify them by reducing them to 1/4 hit points (and reduce their experience awarded by 1/4 to compensate*).</p><p> </p><p>Damage and other abilities are unchanged.</p><p> </p><p>Create a difficult encounter using these modified creatures. This gives you around 20 monsters with which to populate the area. Place them in a variety of different rooms (perhaps with the ability to come running if an alarm is sounded, etc.) </p><p> </p><p>The end result is an area where the players experience is that of numerous monsters requiring an ongoing battle of multiple 'encounters. Rather than encounter driven combats with no time left to consider the space between those encounters, the entire area is now relevant and exploring and interaction becomes more important. </p><p> </p><p>Because this extended encounter space takes place without resting (and is thus a single encounter), the game mechanisms are still somewhat balaced.</p><p> </p><p>In short, you have an area that feels more like an old-school game than it does a modern game while adhering to the basic game mechanics.</p><p> </p><p>(In practice, I will probably have this area lead to a more traditional 4E encounter whose opponents feel even stronger by comparison to the 1/4 hp ones mentioned above.)</p><p> </p><p>Comments? Anyone tried anything like this?</p><p> </p><p>Carl</p><p> </p><p>*And yes, I know that this makes them grant the same experience as a minion by RAW. However I don't think there is any question but that minions are not worth 1/4 of a regular. These creatures are far closer to being 1/4 of a regular. Minions ought to be more like 1/8 or less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Syrsuro, post: 4923157, member: 58162"] After playing 4E for over a year (and 3.5 for several years before that) I have finally come to grips with what it is that makes me yearn quietly for the older school systems (O/AD&D)and why I see both 3.x and 4E as serious departures from that. And no, I don't want to get into system bashing - that isn't the point. People like what they like. In my case, although I like many things about 4E I do see a major shift in what the players [I]do[/I] during a play session. Not one mandated by the rules and not one that couldn't be avoided in theory. But one that, none-the-less was due to the game mechanics. In the older games, combats were shorter. Now this seems so obvious, that it hardly needs to be said. It wasn't difficult to fit 10 or more combat encounters into a game session. But was is often missed is that those 10 or more combat encounters [I]still[/I] took up only around half of the game time. The rest was spent exploring and interacting with the environment (both physical and social). This is the reason why many people say that there is less roleplaying in 4E - it isn't that there needs to be, it is just that combats are these huge, monolithic blocks of time which tend to not leave as much time for anything else (unless you decide to cut back on the number of combats which, although fine for some, doesn't actually represent how the game was played - at least not in my experience. Which brings me to the change I am considering for some areas... Create an area with some reason why resting (even 5 minute rests) are not viable. This reason can be wandering monsters, hazardous effects (extreme cold) or whatever. Decide on the monsters that will populate this area and modify them by reducing them to 1/4 hit points (and reduce their experience awarded by 1/4 to compensate*). Damage and other abilities are unchanged. Create a difficult encounter using these modified creatures. This gives you around 20 monsters with which to populate the area. Place them in a variety of different rooms (perhaps with the ability to come running if an alarm is sounded, etc.) The end result is an area where the players experience is that of numerous monsters requiring an ongoing battle of multiple 'encounters. Rather than encounter driven combats with no time left to consider the space between those encounters, the entire area is now relevant and exploring and interaction becomes more important. Because this extended encounter space takes place without resting (and is thus a single encounter), the game mechanisms are still somewhat balaced. In short, you have an area that feels more like an old-school game than it does a modern game while adhering to the basic game mechanics. (In practice, I will probably have this area lead to a more traditional 4E encounter whose opponents feel even stronger by comparison to the 1/4 hp ones mentioned above.) Comments? Anyone tried anything like this? Carl *And yes, I know that this makes them grant the same experience as a minion by RAW. However I don't think there is any question but that minions are not worth 1/4 of a regular. These creatures are far closer to being 1/4 of a regular. Minions ought to be more like 1/8 or less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E Oldschool
Top