Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Victim" data-source="post: 4454241" data-attributes="member: 78">Then you didn't use the challenge; I'll update later when it's not so stupidly late.  I interpreted it as requiring you to engage in some way even on a new target, because that's basically starting the power from the top on the new target.  "The target remains marked until you use this power against another target, or if you fail to engage the target."  If there was some sort of 1 round grace period - a hypothetical "must engage on your next turn..." - then marking a new guy would free you from the engage requirement right away.Since the mound didn't attack, there's not a big difference for this round anyway.  And since it's moving away from you, while Xak seems to be somewhat pinned down, then engaging the mound next round might be tough anyway.  Wow, I completely missed that flanking change.  Good call.  In this case, it doesn't make a difference since the BBs rolled so high, but still.  Hmm, now I might have to rethink my warlord's weapon choice - there's less value in reach if I have to move next to people to flank; every +2 helps when trying to set up a buff.Who needs INT?  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />(&^*!  The forum being down all day really sucks.</blockquote>